Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

RELEASE

PERIOD

ACTUAL

EXPECTED (consensus)

LAST

HIA COMMENT

(leading, coincident, or lagging indicator)

Existing Home Sales (leading)

October

6.10M

5.70M

5.57M

Removing seasonal adjustments that call into question the accuracy of the “headline” figure, existing home sales rose 6.6% from September and 20.8% from a year ago.
GDP (lagging)

3Q09 preliminary

2.8%

2.8%

3.5%

The lowered estimate of third quarter economic activity was primarily driven by an upward revision to imports and downward revisions to consumer and business spending.
S&P Case-Shiller 20-city Home Price Index (lagging)

September

146.5

NA

146.0

The rate of price declines fell for the fifth consecutive month, to -9.4% compared to the same month last year.  Nineteen of the 20 MSAs showed year-over-year improvement in prices and 9 showed month-over-month raises. Prices stand at their autumn 2003 levels.
Durable Goods Orders (leading)

October

-0.6%

0.5%

2.0%

Orders excluding transportation fell -1.3% and excluding defense-related items rose 0.4%.  Monthly bright spots included orders for primary metals (+3.6%), electrical equipment (+2.7%) and nondefense aircraft and parts (+50.8%). Weakness was seen in defense aircraft (-6.5%), computers (-7.2%) and machinery (-8.0%). Over the past 12 months durable goods orders have dropped -23.0%.
Consumer Spending (leading)

October (MoM)

0.7%

0.5%

-0.6%

On an inflation-adjusted basis, MoM spending rose 0.4%.
Univ of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (leading)

November

67.4

67.0

70.6

American consumers’ opinion about the economy remained very sour in November. October’s figure was revised upward from 66.0.
New Home Sales (leading)

October

430K

410K

405K

New home sales have risen 31% from their cycle low in January 2009. The inventory-to-sales ratio now stands at 6.7 months, down from a peak of 12.4 months.

Positively, the estimate of housing stock outstanding continued to fall; the measure now stands at 7 months.  Government stimulus is clearly underpinning the housing market, where buyers rushed to “get under the wire” to receive the first-time homebuyers credit, initially scheduled to expire in November.  The housing market’s also being supported in a less obvious way, through the Federal Reserve purchase of mortgage-backed securities, a key mechanism for providing liquidity to lenders and keeping mortgage interest rates down. Those purchases, however, expand the Fed’s balance sheet and exacerbate longer-term inflationary concerns.

This week’s release is our second look at 3Q GDP, which was revised downward as expected.  If the obvious stimulative effect of “cash-for-clunkers”, the first-time homebuyer’s tax incentive, and other measures were removed, the growth rate would clearly be significantly lower.  The downward revisions to consumer and business spending are troubling, since (1) business investment is a precursor of stability in the manufacturing sector, widely touted as likely to be a key driver of the US economy out of recession, and (2) as we have consistently observed, since the US consumer represents about 70% of economic activity, demand from that sector is critical.

Orders for new long-lived goods rebounded lower from a surge in September. While a useful anticipatory measure of manufacturing sector activity, the data on durable goods orders is a very volatile series.

As expected consumer spending data was boosted by the “cash-for-clunkers” program. Personal savings declined slightly, to 4.4% from 4.6% in September.

Within the U of M Consumer Sentiment Index, the measure of current conditions, which reflects Americans’ perceptions of their own finances and whether it is a good time to buy big ticket items such as cars and homes, fell to 68.8 from 73.7, which was the highest in a year.  The index of expectations six months from now, which more closely projects the direction of consumer spending, decreased to 66.5 from 68.6.

The margin of error for New Home Sales 6.2% month-over-month increase was 17.6%, so as usual the initial estimate should be taken with a grain of salt. Also, the gains were not distributed evenly across the US, as the South saw most of the uptick.  As with existing home sales, the spike in new home sales can in part be attributed to the recently-extended and expanded first-time homebuyer tax credit. The declining volume of new homes for sale reflects both that purchase activity has increased and that, as indicated in the recently discussed construction statistics, homebuilders have slowed the pace at which they’ve added to the housing stock.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

In my weekly search to leaven Mondays with a chuckle (which is even harder than usual, I might note, when one returns from a long weekend vacation!) I discovered what I’m sure is the “must have” app for economist iPhone users – “Bailout Ben” (BailoutBen.com).  According to the website:

Bailout Ben (aka Helicopter Benny), the intrepid pilot of Bail Force One, is on a mission to engineer the biggest bailout in the history of the universe!

Benny’s helicopter is flying lower and lower, and if he doesn’t bail out every single company he will crash & burn!

bailoutben_iphone_mainshot11

The names of the companies to be bailed out are shown on the bottom of the screen, in stock ticker format. For example, C for Citigroup, GM for General Motors.

The debt of each company is denoted by the blue and green bars. The taller the bar, the greater the toxic debt.

Tap the screen to drop a bundle of dollars and help bail out a company. Only one wad of cash can be dropped at a time, so manage your bailouts carefully.

Land the helicopter and see Benny dance to the funky beat*. Or be trampled by a herd of piggy banks, angry at the lack of money flowing their way. Sometimes they get really mad and then it’s “Oh my gosh they killed Benny!”

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

RELEASE

PERIOD

ACTUAL

EXPECTED (consensus)

LAST

HIA COMMENT

(leading, coincident, or lagging indicator)

Advance Retail Sales (leading)

October

1.4%

0.9%

-2.3%

Excluding auto sales, retail sales rose 0.2%. Gasoline sales were surprisingly flat. On the positive side, the biggest gainers were food services & drinking places, up 1.2%; nonstore retailers; and miscellaneous store retailers, up 0.9%. Two of the biggest losers were those still suffering from the slump in housing. Building materials & garden equipment dropped 2.4% while furniture & home furnishings slipped 0.8%.

Industrial Production (coincident)

October

0.1%

0.4%

0.6%

Manufacturing, which accounts for about 12% of the US economy, slowed the pace of its climb in October. The manufacturing component of the IP index declined -0.1 percent, following a revised 0.8 percent jump in September. In the latest month, utilities output rebounded 1.6% while mining output dipped -0.2%.

Capacity Utilization (coincident)

October

70.7%

70.7%

70.5%

CapU moved upward for the fourth consecutive month but remains near record lows.

Consumer Price Index (lagging)

October (YoY)

-0.2%

-1.3%

The food and energy indices have fallen over the past 12 months, by -0.6% and -14.0% respectively.

Consumer Price Index ex- food & energy (lagging)

October (YoY)

1.7%

1.5%

The indices for shelter (which comprises about 40% of the total index weight), new and used vehicles, medical care and services have risen YoY.

Housing Starts (leading)

October

529K

600K

590K

Seasonally-adjusted annualized Starts fell -10.6% from September (8.7% margin of error). Single family Starts were reported to have fallen -6.8% (7.5% MoE) over the month. Further, without the seasonal adjustment, year-to-date Starts fell -40.5% in comparison to 2008.

Building Permits (leading)

October

552K

NA

573K

Seasonally-adjusted annualized Permits fell -4.0%; permits for single family residences declined only -0.2%.

Leading Economic Indicators (leading)

October

0.3%

0.4%

1.0%

LEI rose for the seventh consecutive month, albeit at a slower pace. A sister index, the Coincident Economic Index, has been flat since mid-year.

As suggested above, most of the jump in the retail sales figure came from autos, which showed more carry-through than expected after the expiration of “Cash-for-Clunkers”. Discretionary spending moved higher in October, with industries like apparel and general merchandise seeing welcome gains that suggest consumer purse-strings may be loosening somewhat.  However, as noted in the table industries related to housing continue to suffer. The revision downward in Sept retail sales (-1.5% to -2.3%) suggests that the initial 3.5% print on 3Q09 GDP will be revised downward.

We’ve now seen three months of reasonably healthy retail sales. We’re pleased to see firming consumer spending, declining consumer debt and increased savings, but the three indicators would seem to be at odds with one another. Given the consumer’s central role in the recession we’ll continue to watch these and other data points closely for signs of divergence.

The apparent stabilization in the manufacturing sector, while it has yet to create jobs, is a tick in the positive column for the US economy. October’s gain was largely due to an 1.6% increase in output of the nation’s utilities. Factory capacity utilization remains extremely low and is especially weak in the manufacturing sector, which had a utilization rate of only 67.6% in October. While a high degree of spare capacity means inflation is unlikely in the near-term, it also suggests that companies’ profit margins have not sustained the degree of pressure they have seen in prior recessions.

The month-over-month change in CPI was largely driven by auto and energy costs; according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics the increase in the indices for cars and trucks accounted for 90%+ of the core index increase.  Given the weakness in household balance sheets, that increase is unlikely to be “sticky”. The concentration of price rises in energy and autos also suggests that full-blown inflation has yet to appear. In short, there are few signs of pricing power at the retail level.

A 35% drop in apartment construction (to a record low) dragged down housing starts. Uncertainty about the $8000 first-time homebuyer tax credit probably contributed to the drop in construction. As discussed in previous missives, a low construction rate offers the silver lining of limiting growth of the housing supply, thereby underpinning prices.

The Leading Economic Indicators continued their positive trajectory for the seventh consecutive month.  We’ll surely welcome the glimmer of good news.  The heaviest weighted component, money supply (specifically M2), has exploded as the government has flooded the economy with fiscal and monetary stimulus. Unfortunately, little of that liquidity is being transmitted into the real economy, as bank lending is contracting – total loans and leases at US commercial banks fell from $7,299B to $6,717B from last October to this. It is, of course, actual lending to businesses and consumers that fuels the economy, not simply the existence of the funds on bank balance sheets.  Other LEI components, like the “new orders from manufacturers”, are suspect in their usefulness because this recession, stemming from a banking crisis and fueled by massive consumer deleveraging,  is quite different than other post-WW2 downturn.  Long story short, we think the LEI is giving a false signal of the strength of economic recovery.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Always on the lookout for the opportunity to start the work-week with a chuckle rather than a grimace, I stumbled upon the graph presented below from a blog entitled “Overthinking It”(overthinkingit.com) via one of my regular reads, “The Big Picture”, written by economist Barry Ritholtz (ritholtz.com).

In short it highlights the risk of confusing correlation with causation, an ever-present danger to those of us who wallow daily in an enormous volume of sometimes obscure statistics.

On its face, the chart suggests that the rising price of gasoline is due to the waning quality of decent rock songs, or lower oil production has caused a mass songwriting malaise…

500-us-oil-production11

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

RELEASE

PERIOD

ACTUAL

EXPECTED (consensus)

LAST

HIA COMMENT

(leading, coincident, or lagging indicator)

Trade Balance (lagging)

September

-$36.5B

-$32.5B

-$30.7B

After narrowing briefly in August, the trade deficit widened sharply in September on significantly higher oil imports. However, exports also rose, benefitted by the declining US Dollar and apparent stability in some foreign economies.

We’d like to take advantage of a “lull in the action” – there was only one bit of economic data worthy of note last week – to offer some brief thoughts on inflation, interest rates and banks.

The week ending last Friday saw the monthly auction of 3- and 10-year Treasury Notes and the 30-year Bond (As an aside, Treasury securities are called Bills, Notes, and Bonds depending on their original term to maturity. Don’t know why – seems contrived if you ask me.) Given the high level of concern about our rising deficit and the explosion of Treasury debt that is being and will be issued to fund it, the auction results are worth watching. One of the key concerns being voiced is, “if the rising deficit and debt levels cause concern among bond market participants, they may not show up to bid, which will push interest rates higher.” That problem was not in evidence this week, as bids made outweighed those accepted to a record degree for the 3- and 10-year Notes. The 30-year saw a lower “bid-to-cover ratio” that was the lowest since May, but the ratio was higher than many previous auctions.  In short, there was little sign that potential buyers might not bid out of fear of rising inflation. Of course, it will be important to watch this data for trends.

How are banks involved with Treasury purchases? They are, some believe, one of the primary groups of purchasers recently.  It’s logical – if they’re (as a group) concerned about credit quality and/or there aren’t many interested borrowers, they can buy risk-free Treasury securities using almost free funding, since deposit rates are artificially low thanks to a 0% Fed Funds rate.  Such a trade doesn’t help grow the economy, but it sure makes your balance sheet look good, and who doesn’t like making almost risk-free money (and probably keeping the regulators happy in the process)?

SELECTED ASSETS OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN THE U.S. (in billions)

September 2008

September 2009

Treasury & Agency Securities

$1149.4

$1384.4

Loans & leases

$7076.4

$6797.0

–Commercial & Industrial

$1580.8

$1411.8

–Real Estate

$3662.2

$3776.7

–Consumer Loans

$835.1

$848.7

Cash Assets

$388.1

$1061.2

In practice, much of banks’ excess liquidity is simply being placed on account at the Fed itself, as is evidenced in the “cash assets” row in the table above.  And, as is also evident from the table, banks are apparently lending (or at least the value of their assets have been marked up) – balances in some loan categories increased from 9/08 to 9/09.  Nonetheless, banks and other “temporary” buyers of Treasuries are a double-edged sword – their demand may be keeping rates low now, but wouldn’t those funds be of more value to the broad economy if they were lent to creditworthy businesses and consumers as the economy struggles to regain its footing?

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

RELEASE

PERIOD

ACTUAL

EXPECTED (consensus)

LAST

HIA COMMENT

(leading, coincident, or lagging indicator)

ISM Manufacturing Index (leading)

October

55.70

53.00

52.60

Coincident and lagging indicators, not leading indicators, gave a big lift to the ISM’s manufacturing index last month.

Construction Spending (leading)

September (MoM)

0.80%

-0.20%

-0.10%

Construction spending was sharply higher than expected for September but a large downward revision to August was essentially offsetting.

ISM Non-manufactur-ing Composite (leading)

October

50.60

51.60

50.90

The ISM’s non-manufacturing index shows little change in month-to-month activity, pointing to fractional but still very welcome growth for the bulk of the nation’s businesses.

Consumer Credit (lagging)

September

$(14.80)

$(10.00)

$(12.00)

Between consumers sticking their money into savings and banks cutting back on loans, consumer credit continues to tighten.

Unemploy-ment Rate (lagging)

October

10.20%

9.90%

9.80%

Highest unemployment rate since 1983. According to the Household Survey the number of unemployed Americans reached 15.7 million in October; this number has risen by 8.2 million since the official beginning of the recession in December 2007.

Nonfarm Payrolls (lagging)

October

-190K

-175K

-219K

The seasonally adjusted data show a drop in employment in all categories except Education & Healthcare, Government and Professional and Business Services. The “birth/death” model used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to estimate jobs created or lost by opening or closing firms “created” 86K jobs in October.

EMPLOYMENT SITUATION

The most closely-watched economic release of the week (and the month) was today’s Employment Situation. It’s somewhat confusing because it contains data from two surveys, the Household and the Establishment, that are conducted differently and therefore provide different estimates. Also, each Survey shows both Seasonally Adjusted and Not Seasonally Adjusted data, so getting a read on what’s actually happening is challenging. The “headline” numbers are the Unemployment Rate from the Household Survey and the Nonfarm Payrolls figure from the Establishment Survey, both of which are seasonally adjusted. For a broader discussion of the Employment Situation data, see our Economic Insight research entitled “Fun With Numbers” released 5 September 09.

Household Survey

Adjusted for seasonal variations, the Household Survey data showed that the number of unemployed persons rose by 558K during October, by 6.4 million over the past year and by 15.7 million since the beginning of the recession. Companies have clearly shifted some work to from full-timers to part-timers; full-time workers have declined by 8.5 million over the past year while part-time workers have increased by 2.1 million. Multiple job-holders remained basically flat at about 5% of the total employed. The average duration of unemployment rose to 26.2 weeks – over 6 months – with an alarming 35.6% of unemployed Americans falling in that category. The broadest measure of unemployment, which includes “marginally attached” and “discouraged” workers rose to 17.5% in October from 17.0% in September.

According to the Household Survey the unemployment rates for natural resource, construction and maintenance professions rose to 15.5%, with construction hitting 19.1%. The unemployment rate for production, transportation and material moving occupations rose to 13.0% .

Establishment Survey

The seasonally adjusted Establishment Survey data showed declines in all major industry groups except Professional and Business Services (+18K, driven largely by increases in administrative businesses) and Education and Healthcare (+45K, with gains in all but one sub-category). Government employment totals were unchanged from September, with gains in Federal employment offset by losses at the state level. The largest declines were in Construction (-62K) and Manufacturing (-61K).

The “birth/death” model used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to estimate jobs created or lost by opening or closing firms “created” 86K jobs in October.

Positively, average hourly earnings rose to $18.72 in October, up $0.04 from September and $0.45 from a year ago. Gains were broad-based, with declines from year-ago earnings in only a handful of non-durable manufacturing industries.

However, the average work-week remained very short, at around 33 hours. The longest work-weeks were recorded in Mining & Logging and Petroleum & Coal Products (43.5 hours), Transportation Equipment (42.8 hours) and Paper Products (42.4 hours). The shortest hours were, unsurprisingly, in Leisure & Hospitality (24.4 hours), Retail (29.8 hours) and Education & Healthcare (32.2 hours).

Analysis

The Establishment Survey has a “large company” bias, which is why the “birth/death model” is used. Given the importance of small businesses in our economy, we believe (and the historical record would suggest) that these businesses are the “canary in the coalmine” of domestic economic activity, since they have less cash on the balance sheet, less access to credit, and less exposure to overseas markets than large companies. As noted above, the Household Survey, which captures small companies, showed a seasonally adjusted decline of -558K jobs last month, compared to the -190K loss reported in the Establishment Survey. We will watch for improvement in the Household Survey, which should lead the Establishment Survey, before we become more sanguine about the employment situation.

Harmonic continues to believe that employment is the linchpin of the economic cycle. When unemployment moderates so that consumers feel more secure, they’re likely to feel more comfortable spending rather than saving. While consumer spending data have shown recent “green shoots” we worry that without the support of income through job creation debt levels will remain unsustainably high, delaying an organic and robust economic recovery.

ISM MANUFACTURING

This Index grew for the third consecutive month after 18 months of declines. The production component rose a strong 7.6% to 63.3 in October; however, new orders slumped 2.3% to 58.5. Expansion is indicated by readings >50.

Analysis

This Index is sensitive to exports, which have been greatly aided by the declining value of the US Dollar. The growth in the employment component of this Index is inconsistent with the contraction seen in today’s Employment Situation data. Those economists predicting a sharp economic rebound on the basis of strength in this Index, a component of which is a part of the Leading Economic Indicators, are mislead; unlike other post-WW2 recessions, this one is driven by the unwinding of excessive debt and a faltering banking system. The comparisons are simply not apt.

CONSTRUCTION SPENDING

The boost in spending in September was led by a 3.8 percent surge in private residential outlays. Private nonresidential declined 1.8 percent and public outlays decreased 0.1 percent in the latest month.

Analysis

Although housing may be on a slight uptrend, the nonresidential and public sectors are still in recession and it may be some time before they turn up. Very weak employment in the sector notwithstanding, a low level of residential construction is not necessarily a bad thing, given the enormous inventory of homes available for sale.

ISM NON-MANUFACTURING

This service sector Index provides a good read on the state of domestic demand, since most US services are consumed domestically. It grew for the second consecutive month but at a slower than expected rate. Services represent about 80% of the US economy.

The business conditions index, akin to a production index, showed a stronger rate of month-to-month growth, at 55.2 for a 1 tenth gain. The new orders index offers even better news, up 1.4 points to a very solid 55.6. This index, in contrast to the ISM’s new orders index on the manufacturing side, is accelerating and will hopefully continue to accelerate in the months ahead. Order backlogs were also higher, up 2 points to 53.5. However, the employment index fell more than 3 points to 41.1.

Analysis

Arguably more important than the Manufacturing Index because of the proportion of services in the economy and the domestic nature of demand for them, this Index is considerably weaker than its Manufacturing counterpart.

CONSUMER CREDIT

Revolving credit, mostly credit cards, fell a whopping $9.9 billion (-13.3%) from August, with non-revolving, mostly car loans, down $4.9 billion (-3.7%) month-over-month.

Analysis

While consumer spending is one of the main engines of US economic activity, that much of that spending was done on credit is precisely the genesis of much of our current discomfort. While short-term thinking bemoans the reduction in credit, a broader view suggests that debt reduction to more sustainable levels is an appropriate thing for a healthy economy. Readers may recall that consumer spending has not declined to nearly the degree consumer credit has, begging the question how spending may remain stable or rise while savings rises and credit outstanding falls.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

It is with some degree of resignation that I herein offer my opinion of gold as an investment. I generally try not to add my voice to the cacophony that’s sometimes created around “hot topics”. That said, gold’s rise over the past months is hard to ignore, and several clients and friends of HIA have asked our opinion of the metal.

In this paper I intend to investigate the rationale (if, indeed, investment markets can be said to be rational) those currently investing in gold may be leaning upon and attempt to evaluate the data backing those claims. The proposed explanations and rationalizations for investment in gold are:

  • Gold is a good hedge against inflation, current or expected
  • Gold is a good hedge against deflation
  • Gold is a good hedge against a collapsing US Dollar
  • Gold is a good hedge against uncertain financial conditions

I’ll also discuss other reasons investors may be interested in gold, and note the strategy Harmonic has pursued.

A technical note: Since the suitability of an investment as a hedge is determined by how well it tracks the item it’s supposed to be hedging, I’ve run correlation analyses for gold versus each of the items above. The correlation graphs plot the historical values of gold and the item to be hedged, and the “best fit line” shows the general tendency over the time frame analyzed. I’ve provided “R-squared” as the measure of correlation; simply remember that an R2 of 0.000 means the two items are totally uncorrelated, while 1.000 means they’re perfectly correlated.

Review

Gold’s history as a store of value and currency is well-known and will not be recited here. Observing gold’s historical price changes offers a quick reminder that since 1973, when the US Dollar was removed from the “gold standard”, the metal has seen two major price rises – most recently within the past 5 years, which eclipsed that of the late 1970s and early 1980s.

2009-11-06_1555

Gold as a Current Inflation Hedge

Gold has been widely touted as a hedge against inflation. Indeed, one branch of economic orthodoxy suggests exactly that, and this explanation, like the others examined here, has been provided as an explanation for gold’s recent run-up.

Comparing the long-term data, however, leaves one less than sure about that claim. The upper chart in the exhibit below compares reported consumer inflation and the spot price of gold (that is, for immediate delivery rather than a futures contract) from early 1973, approximately the date the US Dollar was taken off the “gold standard”, to present. The correlation (reported as R2) between CPI and the price of gold over that term is rather low, at 0.385.

2009-11-06_1557

By contrast, the correlation between CPI and the gold price is substantially higher in recent periods. The lower graph shows the correlation since early 2001, around the time when the FOMC began lowering the Fed Funds rate to ostensibly blunt the effects of the bursting of the stock market bubble. The increased correlation between gold and CPI is clear, at almost 93% (0.926).

In recent years it appears that gold has become an excellent hedge for consumer inflation. One must wonder when observing the increased dispersion of the data points on the right side of the lower graph, however, whether this tendency will continue.

Gold as an Expected Inflation Hedge

By definition, the monthly Consumer Price Index reflects historical price data. It stands to reason that investors in gold may be more interested in hedging themselves against potential future price increases than historical ones.

Since Treasury Inflation-protected Securities (TIPS) are constructed so that changes in consumer prices are reflected in their principal value, the difference in yield between those bonds and nominal 10-year US Treasury notes is an approximation of the market’s expectation of inflation over the upcoming 10 years.

2009-11-06_1557_001

The top graph shows that, since the creation of TIPS in the late 1990s, there has been effectively no correlation between gold and expected inflation (R2 = 0.004). However, that correlation, like that of the CPI measured above, has increased dramatically in recent periods, as shown on the lower graph. Weekly data since the cut of the Federal Funds rate to 0% in mid-December 2008 shows a widely dispersed but much higher R2 of 0.508.

Gold as a Deflation Hedge

In comparison to the enormous volume of writings about gold’s efficacy, or lack thereof, as a hedge against inflation, there is precious little research on gold as a hedge against deflation. One probable reason is that extended deflationary periods are rare in the US, which makes quantitative analysis based on the domestic market difficult. In fact, the only relevant period during the 20th century would be the Great Depression, during which time the price of gold was fixed in the sense that the US$ was on the gold standard. However, it’s reasonable to infer that since deflation is corrosive to financial assets such as stocks, non-financial assets like commodities may perform relatively well. Their low correlation to other asset classes is, after all, the reason that Harmonic includes commodities in our clients’ portfolios.

The best modern subject for analysis might be the Japanese economy, which has suffered deflation from the early 1990s to date. However, since gold is priced in US Dollars, such an analysis is really only a backdoor way of evaluating Dollar/Yen exchange rates, which of course is not the subject of this paper.

Gold as a US Dollar Hedge

Probably more than any other argument that’s been put forth of late, the rising price of gold has been attributed to investors concerned about a “collapse” of the US Dollar (US$). Whether the US$ is in fact collapsing is an analysis for another paper; my investigation here is focused only on whether gold is a good hedge against currency debasement. The chart below, graphing the value since 1973 of the trade-weighted US$, shows both the long decline since May 2002 and the recent spike and “collapse”.

2009-11-06_1558

A look at the correlation between the US$ and gold shows, like those analyses correlating gold against the CPI and implied inflation, a relatively low long-term correlation that has risen in recent periods. The analysis presented below uses the same time periods as the one plotting gold against CPI presented above: The upper graph shows the R2 of the US$ versus spot gold at less than 25% (R2 = 0.249), but the R2 since early 2001 is around 67% (R2 = 0.674).

2009-11-06_1559

Gold as a Hedge Against Financial System Risk

The Bloomberg Financial Conditions Index evaluates the level of inputs from the money, stock and bond markets to measure stress in the financial system (if you’d like to have the underlying calculations of the Index, please let me know). The gold price shows a low correlation to the Index back to its earliest calculation in 1991 (R2 = 0.210); further, since the spike in the Index following Lehman Brothers’ collapse in mid-December 2007, the correlation has actually declined marginally (R2 = 0.147).

2009-11-06_1600

Interesting Observations

Comparing the normalized performance of CPI, expected inflation, the US$ and gold provides several interesting observations. Firstly, the US$ (red line) and expected inflation (yellow line) have fallen dramatically since 1997. Secondly, actual reported consumer inflation has risen steadily over the past 13 years (which also suggests another observation – that market participants, at least the ones buying TIPS, don’t do a very good job of forecasting inflation). Thirdly and most importantly for this analysis, the normalized price of gold rose dramatically beginning in mid-2005, which begs the question “why?”

2009-11-06_1601

Perhaps not coincidentally, the most popular and largest gold-focused exchange-traded fund, the S&P Gold Trust (ticker = GLD) began trading in November 2004.

2009-11-06_1602

As shown below, the correlation between the price of gold and the number of GLD shares outstanding is quite high, with an R2 of over 84% (0.842).

2009-11-06_1603

While of course correlation does not necessarily imply causation, I find it very interesting that the price of gold tracks so closely the rise in popularity of an investment vehicle through which individuals and institutional investors may invest in gold bullion without the well-known pitfalls, such as illiquidity and storage costs.

Harmonic Investment Advisors Exposure

Rather than invest directly in gold bullion, coins or futures contracts, HIA invests most clients’ funds in an exchange-traded fund (the iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-indexed Trust, ticker = GSG) that is constructed to mirror the performance of a basket of commodities, specifically the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index. The index, and therefore GSG, holds about 2.75% of its value in gold, so most of our clients have exposure to gold indirectly.

Conclusions

Quantitative evidence suggests many of the assertions being put forth to justify gold purchases are less than iron-clad. While it appears that correlations between gold and CPI, expected inflation and the US$ have increased in recent periods, there is a low correlation between gold and inflation, expected inflation, US$ and financial conditions over the longer-term periods examined. Whether gold is a good long-term hedge in a deflationary environment is inconclusive due to lack of quantitative evidence.

For shorter time spans, gold has been an increasingly accurate inflation hedge in recent years. Whether it continues to be so obviously remains to be seen.

However, the simplest explanation for the rise of gold price may be the correct one – gold’s rising because investors are buying more of it, outpacing supply. If this situation is the case, it clearly implies some degree of speculation – purchasing without a fundamental basis but rather on the belief that others will also find the asset of value and drive the price higher. In this case, that projection may have recently become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

However, I don’t believe gold is yet in a bubble in the traditional sense. According to Merrill Lynch, the gold price would have to climb to over $6000/oz to get the ratio of gold to stocks back to where it was in the bubble of the 70s. While it’s received attention from the popular press, there’s not (yet) a mania for gold. There are, however, increasing demand drivers in addition to the aforementioned ETFs and mutual funds, like central banks (note India’s recent large purchase, with China likely to be next) and retail demand (gold is now being sold over the counter at the Harrods department store in London, cash-for-gold kiosks are springing up at local shopping malls, etc.)

While it is difficult to quantitatively analyze, it appears to me that gold is a good crisis hedge. Obviously it’s impossible to reach a consensus on what constitutes a crisis, but observing the periods during which gold has risen I note that extremes in the gold price coincide with periods of high economic uncertainty – particularly the late 1970s and over the past year.

Also, no investment is the panacea to all financial problems. As shown in the chart below, gold (green line) has periodically underperformed other asset classes like stocks (white line = S&P500), bonds (red line = Barclays Capital Aggregate Index), and real estate (yellow line = Dow Jones US Real Estate Securities index) over long periods of time.

2009-11-06_1603_001

Further, I rhetorically ask the true “gold bugs” who may be purchasing in expectation of a “Mad Max” sort of apocalyptic future: Wouldn’t productive assets like water, fuel and land be better stores of value than a metal one cannot eat, grow or burn for heat? (this is a conclusion, by the way, of Barton Biggs recent book “Wealth War & Wisdom”) In that sense, gold is perhaps the ultimate fiat currency – it has value only because we say it does.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The Fed will keep “exceptionally low” rates for an “extended period”, repeating  words used in prior FOMC announcements. The largest change between the  September 23 Fed Release & today’s release appears to HOUSEHOLD SPENDING.   Spending is up.    So why keep rates low for an extended period?:

1. Low Rates of Resource Utilization

2. Subdued Inflation Trends

3. Stable Inflation Expectations

The Fed cut its planned agency purchases to about $175 billion from $200 billion planned because of the limited availability of such securities. The FOMC maintained its plan to purchase $1.25 trillion in mortgage securities but said that it will “gradually slow the pace of its purchases of both agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities.”

2009-11-04_14391