Author: Chris

Comment: 1

This week our market commentary is going to take a slight turn as today we were notified that our institutional Large Cap Core Equity product has been recognized as a top performer by PSN, a national firm that maintains a database of institutional managers and their products.  In fact, our Large Cap Core Equity product was ranked #1 over the past year in the Large Core Equity universe.

PSN today notified us that our Large Cap Core Equity product has made IIS’ PSN Top Guns List!  This means that we were one of the best performers in at least one of 52 peer groups.  

We do not typically like to trumpet performance, however, we feel that this distinction is a result of the intense efforts we put into providing the highest level of research for our clients.  We will savor this moment, but rest assured that our noses will be back to the grindstone before you can blink an eye.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

This note follows up on Economic Insight research from last summer that discussed the likelihood, in our view, of the FOMC raising the Fed Funds rate.  That article examined the so-called Taylor Rule as a quantitative way to assess that likelihood.  Given that since the article was written last August the volume has risen considerably about the Fed’s potential “exit strategy” from monetary stimulus, it seemed appropriate to revisit the question via the Taylor calculation.

As a reminder, the Taylor Rule was “developed by Stanford economist John Taylor to provide recommendations for how a central bank like the Federal Reserve should set short-term interest rates as economic conditions change to achieve both its short-run goal for stabilizing the economy and its long-run goal for inflation.”1 In its simplest form the calculation uses measures for economic growth, unemployment and inflation to determine the “appropriate” Fed Funds rate.  While in practice the Fed does not use the Taylor Rule to determine the Fed Funds rate, historically the Rule has been a reasonably good approximation of the actual Fed Funds rate.

According to the calculation corresponding to the graph above, the Taylor Rule currently predicts the “appropriate” level of the Fed Funds rate to be -1.45%.   The Funds rate is now effectively 0.00%.

The futures contracts on Fed Funds are currently pricing in an increase in the Fed Funds rate to about 0.50% by November 2010.  The table below shows that the unemployment rate would need to decline below 9.25% (now 9.70%), and inflation, as measured by the Core PCE deflator, would need to rise to 2% or higher (now 1.5%) in order for the Taylor Rule to predict that Fed Funds level.

Comparing consensus forecasts for inflation, the unemployment rate and the rates implied by the Fed Funds futures contracts points out the sharp divergence between the “appropriate” rate proposed by the Taylor Rule and the contract values.

As it was in August 2009, the bottom line for us remains: While the enormous amounts of monetary stimulus applied to the economy over the past year may arguably cause inflation to climb higher in the next few months, the very low likelihood that unemployment will fall in the near-term suggests that short-term interest rates will remain extremely low for some time to come.

1 Federal Reserve Board of San Francisco website

(graphs: Bloomberg LLP)

Author: Chris

Comments: 0

Prepared by Forefield Inc. Copyright 2010 Forefield Inc.

Setting and Targeting Investment Goals

Go out into your yard and dig a big hole. Every month, throw $50 into it, but don’t take any money out until you’re ready to buy a house, send your child to college, or retire.

It sounds a little crazy, doesn’t it? But that’s what investing without setting clear-cut goals is like. If you’re lucky, you may end up with enough money to meet your needs, but you have no way to know for sure.

How do you set investment goals?

Setting investment goals means defining your dreams for the future. When you’re setting goals, it’s best to be as specific as possible. For instance, you know you want to retire, but when? You know you want to send your child to college, but to an Ivy League school or to the community college down the street? Writing down and prioritizing your investment goals is an important first step toward developing an investment plan.

What is your time horizon?

Your investment time horizon is the number of years you have to invest toward a specific goal. Each investment goal you set will have a different time horizon. For example, some of your investment goals will be long term (e.g., you have more than 15 years to plan), some will be short term (e.g., you have 5 years or less to plan), and some will be intermediate (e.g., you have between 5 and 15 years to plan). Establishing time horizons will help you determine how aggressively you will need to invest to accumulate the amount needed to meet your goals.

How much will you need to invest?

Although you can invest a lump sum of cash, many people find that regular, systematic investing is also a great way to build wealth over time.

Start by determining how much you’ll need to set aside monthly or annually to meet each goal. Although you’ll want to invest as much as possible, choose a realistic amount that takes into account your other financial obligations, so that you can easily stick with your plan. But always be on the lookout for opportunities to increase the amount you’re investing, such as participating in an automatic investment program that boosts your contribution by a certain percentage each year, or by dedicating a portion of every raise, bonus, cash gift, or tax refund you receive to your investment objectives.

Which investments should you choose?

No matter what your financial goals, you’ll need to decide how to best allocate your investment dollars. One important consideration is your tolerance for risk. All investments carry some risk, but some carry more than others. How well can you handle market ups and downs? Are you willing to accept a higher degree of risk in exchange for the opportunity to earn a higher rate of return?

Whether you’re investing for retirement, college, or another financial goal, your overall objective is to maximize returns without taking on more risk than you can bear. But no matter what level of risk you’re comfortable with, make sure to choose investments that are consistent with your goals and time horizon. A financial professional can help you construct a diversified investment portfolio that takes these factors into account.

Investment goal and time horizon At 4%, you’ll need to invest At 8%, you’ll need to invest At 12%, you’ll need to invest
Have $10,000 for down payment on home: 5 years $151 per month $136 per month $123 per month
Have $50,000 in college fund: 10 years $340 per month $276 per month $223 per month
Have $250,000 in retirement fund: 20 years $685 per month $437 per month $272 per month
Table assumes 3% annual inflation, and that return is compounded annually; taxes are not considered. This is a hypothetical example and is not intended to reflect the actual performance of any investment.

 

Investing for retirement

After a hard day at the office, do you ask, “Is it time to retire yet?” Retirement may seem a long way off, but it’s never too early to start planning–especially if you want retirement to be the good life you imagine.

For example, let’s say that your goal is to retire at age 65. At age 20 you begin contributing $3,000 per year to your tax-deferred 401(k) account. If your investment earns 6 percent per year, compounded annually, you’ll have approximately $679,000 in your investment account when you retire.

But what would happen if you left things to chance instead? Let’s say that you’re not really worried about retirement, so you wait until you’re 35 to begin investing. Assuming you contributed the same amount to your 401(k) and the rate of return on your investment dollars was the same, you would end up with approximately $254,400. And, as this chart illustrates, if you were to wait until age 45 to begin investing for retirement, you would end up with only about $120,000 by the time you retire.

 

(This is a hypothetical example and is not intended to reflect the actual performance of any investment.)

Investing for college

Perhaps you faced the truth the day your child was born. Or maybe it hit you when your child started first grade: You only have so much time to save for college. In fact, for many people, saving for college is an intermediate-term goal–if you start saving when your child is in elementary school, you’ll have 10 to 15 years to build your college fund. Of course, the earlier you start the better. The more time you have before you need the money, the greater chance you have to build a substantial college fund due to compounding. With a longer investment time frame and a tolerance for some risk, you might also be willing to put some of your money into investments that offer the potential for growth.

Investing for a major purchase

At some point, you’ll probably want to buy a home, a car, or the yacht that you’ve always wanted. Although they’re hardly impulse items, large purchases are usually not something for which you plan far in advance–one to five years is a common time frame.

Because you don’t have much time to invest, you’ll have to budget your investment dollars wisely. Rather than choosing growth investments, you may want to put your money into less volatile, highly liquid investments that have some potential for growth, but that offer you quick and easy access to your money should you need it.

Review and revise

Over time, you may need to update your investment plan. No matter what your investment goal, get in the habit of checking up on your portfolio at least once a year, more frequently if the market is particularly volatile or when there have been significant changes in your life. You may need to rebalance your portfolio to bring it back in line with your investment goals and risk tolerance. If you need help, a financial professional can help you decide which investment options are right for you. 

At some point, you’ll probably want to buy a home, a car, or the yacht that you’ve always wanted. Although they’re hardly impulse items, large purchases are usually not something for which you plan far in advance–one to five years is a common time frame.

Because you don’t have much time to invest, you’ll have to budget your investment dollars wisely. Rather than choosing growth investments, you may want to put your money into less volatile, highly liquid investments that have some potential for growth, but that offer you quick and easy access to your money should you need it.

Review and revise

Over time, you may need to update your investment plan. No matter what your investment goal, get in the habit of checking up on your portfolio at least once a year, more frequently if the market is particularly volatile or when there have been significant changes in your life. You may need to rebalance your portfolio to bring it back in line with your investment goals and risk tolerance. If you need help, a financial professional can help you decide which investment options are right for you.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The recently released Federal Reserve’s survey of senior loan officers showed a tentative improvement of credit conditions during 4Q09, with a smaller proportion of banks tightening standards and demand improving across C&I and CRE loan types, but demand remaining weak for Residential Real Estate and Consumer loans (quotes from the Report in italics):

The January survey indicated that commercial banks generally ceased tightening standards on many loan types in the fourth quarter of last year but have yet to unwind the considerable tightening that has occurred over the past two years. The net percentages of banks reporting tighter loan terms continued to trend lower.  Banks reported that loan demand from both businesses and households weakened further, on net, over the survey period.

Details within the report are instructive with regard to loan demand and credit availability.

Large banks are lending more freely than small ones

  • Some of the largest domestic banks (those with assets greater than $20 billion) reported having eased loan terms to large and middle-market firms, particularly terms pertaining to loan maturities and loan spreads.
  • Moderate net percentages of smaller domestic bank respondents (those with total assets below $20 billion) continued to tighten terms on loans to firms of all sizes.

Loans to small businesses are still harder to obtain than loans for larger companies

  • The net fractions of domestic banks that tightened terms on loans to small firms were generally a little larger than the net fractions that tightened terms on loans to large and middle-market firms.

Demand for commercial loans continued to weaken, as did the supply of credit for commercial and residential real estate

  • Demand for C&I loans from firms of all sizes weakened further, on net, over the past three months.
  • Large net fractions of both domestic and foreign institutions again reported having tightened a range of terms on CRE loans over the
    course of 2009.
  • Banks continued to tighten standards on residential real estate loans over the past three months.


Importantly, however, credit availability to consumers increased

  • A small net fraction of banks reported an increased willingness to make consumer installment loans.


The Report belies the notion that banks lent blindly in the face of mounting credit problems in the run up to the Lehman collapse, and that they have refused to lend as the economy struggles to regain its footing.  The graphs support the idea that demand remains weak and credit availability is not uniform, but on balance the credit situation is improving. This in turn suggests that, in the near term, inflation will not become a problem. Should the trend continue the Fed may be forced into executing its “exit strategy” however. 

We’ll be watching this Report closely for signs of inflationary pressures building.

(graphs: Federal Reserve Board)

Author: Chris

Comments: 0

I am hoping that most of you haven’t noticed that the recent market declines coincided with us beginning to write a weekly market commentary.  For those of you who did notice, I have good news, I get to write about the market having positive returns as the S&P 500 advanced just under 1% for the week.

Fortunately the markets never established a sense of direction for the week, given that the last two were very pronounced in their declines.  The economic calendar was light for the week and most of the earnings reports were positive.  I will note that the previous two weeks earnings were being released from manufacturing industries, whereas this week was primarily Technology and Healthcare.  This is important in that this week most companies guided forward earnings higher, which was not necessarily the case in the previous two weeks.  Also, it is not uncommon to the markets to digest large moves in either direction as investors wait for further affirmation of the issues that drove them to be sellers or buyers in the large numbers that create these moves.  The next couple of weeks of earnings should provide little for surprise, but as we move into March, the retailers will begin reporting numbers, and it could make for some volatility in the markets.  On a side note, it is interesting how the snow storms shut down the federal government but not the financial markets at the same time the government is trying to increase their oversight and regulation of the financial industry.  Hmmmm?

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Courtesy of VisualEconomics.com, a series of handy graphics on Americans’ retirement investments. The link at the bottom of this post allows the viewer to use the retirement calculator.

http://www.visualeconomics.com/retirement-the-economy-and-what-you-should-do-about-it-all/

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The week ending 12 February was light in terms of market-moving economic data. Nonetheless, we were given incremental insight into two of the components of GDP – trade and consumer spending.

Both reports suggested stability if not growth of their respective segments of the economy.  The trade gap widened, but the report indicated a continued rebound of the export sector. Similarly, consumer spending rose a bit more than expected, suggesting that American consumers are feeling incrementally more confident as the unemployment rate and house prices appear to have stabilized, at least for the time being.

 

RELEASE (leading, coincident or lagging indicator) PERIOD ACTUAL EXPECTED (consensus) LAST HIA COMMENT

Trade Balance (lagging)

December -$40.2 billion -$35.7 billion -$36.4 billion The trade gap widened on higher petroleum imports. Positively, though, the uptrend in exports continued
Retail Sales (leading) January (MoM) +0.5% +0.3% -0.3% Month-over-month sales rose more than expectations and are +4.7% above January 2009.

 

TRADE BALANCE

The more-negative trade deficit increases the potential for a downward revision to 4Q09 GDP growth. A surge in the price of petroleum imports accounted for most of the decline; the trade-weighted US Dollar strengthening 3.0% during the month was a headwind to US exporters, but the US$ is still well below its recent high in March. The key takeaway here is a slow resurgence in the strength of the US export sector, which was up +3.3% during December. Also, the increase in exports and imports is welcome after a recession that saw a sharp slowdown in world trade.

RETAIL SALES

Adjusted for seasonal variations, sales at US retailers rose for the third time in four months. Sales at the largest categories of retailers were flat to higher during January, including motor vehicle & parts dealers (0.0%), food & beverage stores (+0.8%), general merchandise (+1.5%), and restaurants (+0.6%).  Housing related retailers remained weak, including furniture & home furnishings (-1.4%) and building materials & garden supplies (-1.2%).  Gasoline station sales rose +0.4% during January and a whopping 29.0% over the previous 12 months.

Month-over-month change in total retail sales (white) and ex-autos (red); Feb 2007 – Jan 2010

Graph: Bloomberg LLP

Author: Chris

Comments: 0

Consumer Alert: Check Your Credit Card Statements This Month


Dale Dixon

Published: Yesterday

As your credit card statement arrives in the mail this month and March, start looking for a few changes. On Feb. 22, new consumer protections kick in, thanks to the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009.

About 75 percent of cardholders admit to not reading the terms and conditions of their credit cards, according to a CreditCards.com survey.

Remember: The large print giveth and the fine print taketh away. Here are a few items you might find interesting:

MORE NOTICE FOR INTEREST RATE CHANGES: Card issuers must give card holders 45 days advance notice in the event of an interest rate change. Additionally, promotional rates must apply for at least six months, and, unless disclosed up front, card holders cannot have their rate increased in the first year.

CARDHOLDER OPT-OUT: If there are significant changes made to the terms of the account, card holders can choose to reject those changes and will have five years to pay off the balance under the original terms.

Older Age Restrictions Added: Card issuers are no longer allowed to issue a credit card to people under 21 unless they can prove they have the means to repay debt or if an adult older than 21 co-signs on the account. Credit card companies also face new restrictions on how they can promote cards to college students.

NEW RULES FOR MONTHLY STATEMENTS: In response to complaints that bill due dates were being moved up – and leading to increased late fees – monthly statements must now be mailed or delivered 21 days before the due dates. Additionally, card issuers no longer can set a payment deadline before 5 p.m. and cannot charge card holders if they pay online, over the phone or by mail – unless the payment is made over the phone either on the due date or the previous day.

OVERPAYMENTS GO TOWARD HIGHEST INTEREST BALANCES: If the card holder has varied interest rates for different services or accounts, any overpayments must be applied to the account that is incurring the highest interest rate.

OVER THE LIMIT OPT-IN: Card holders must opt-in to be able to exceed their credit limit – and subsequently be charged an over-limit fee by the issuer. If card holders choose not to opt-in, then they will not be able to exceed their credit limit and incur any fees.

INCREASED DISCLOSURE ON MINIMUM PAYMENTS: Card issuers must disclose how long it will take card holders to pay off their bill if they only pay the minimum monthly payment as well as how much the card holder would need to pay every month to pay off the balance in 36 months.

SAY GOODBYE TO DOUBLE-BILLING CYCLES: When calculating finance charges, card issuers can no longer employ two-cycle or double billing – a method that causes cardholders to pay interest on previously paid balances.

Dale Dixon is president and CEO of the Better Business Bureau, a not-for-profit organization serving Southwest Idaho and eastern Oregon. Reach him at 342-4649 or ddixon@boise.bbb.org.

Author: Chris

Comments: 0

 

All about IRAs

An individual retirement arrangement (IRA) is a personal retirement savings plan that offers specific tax benefits. In fact, IRAs are one of the most powerful retirement savings tools available to you. Even if you’re contributing to a 401(k) or other plan at work, you should also consider investing in an IRA.

What types of IRAs are available?

There are two major types of IRAs: traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs. Both allow you to make annual contributions of up to $5,000 in 2009 and 2010. Generally, you must have at least as much taxable compensation as the amount of your IRA contribution. But if you are married filing jointly, your spouse can also contribute to an IRA, even if he or she does not have taxable compensation. The law also allows taxpayers age 50 and older to make additional “catch-up” contributions. These folks can put up to $6,000 in their IRAs in 2009 and 2010.

Both traditional and Roth IRAs feature tax-sheltered growth of earnings. And both give you a wide range of investment choices. However, there are important differences between these two types of IRAs. You must understand these differences before you can choose the type of IRA that’s best for you.

Traditional IRAs

Practically anyone can open and contribute to a traditional IRA. The only requirements are that you must have taxable compensation and be under age 70½. You can contribute the maximum allowed each year as long as your taxable compensation for the year is at least that amount. If your taxable compensation for the year is below the maximum contribution allowed, you can contribute only up to the amount you earned.

Tax Year 2010
Individuals Covered by an Employer Plan
Filing status Deduction is limited if MAGI between: No deduction if MAGI over:
Single/Head of household $56,000 – $66,000 $66,000
Married joint* $89,000 – $109,000 $109,000
Married separate $0 – $10,000 $10,000
* If you’re not covered by an employer plan, but your spouse is, your deduction is limited if your MAGI is $167,000 to $177,000, and eliminated if your MAGI exceeds $177,000.

Your contributions to a traditional IRA may be tax deductible on your federal income tax return. This is important because tax-deductible (pretax) contributions lower your taxable income for the year, saving you money in taxes. If neither you nor your spouse is covered by a 401(k) or other employer-sponsored plan, you can generally deduct the full amount of your annual contribution. If one of you is covered by such a plan, your ability to deduct your contributions depends on your annual income (modified adjusted gross income, or MAGI) and your income tax filing status. You may qualify for a full deduction, a partial deduction, or no deduction at all.

What happens when you start taking money from your traditional IRA? Any portion of a distribution that represents deductible contributions is subject to income tax because those contributions were not taxed when you made them. Any portion that represents investment earnings is also subject to income tax because those earnings were not previously taxed either. Only the portion that represents nondeductible, after-tax contributions (if any) is not subject to income tax. In addition to income tax, you may have to pay a 10% early withdrawal penalty if you’re under age 59½, unless you meet one of the exceptions.

If you wish to defer taxes, you can leave your funds in the traditional IRA, but only until April 1 of the year following the year you reach age 70½. That’s when you have to take your first required minimum distribution from the IRA. After that, you must take a distribution by the end of every calendar year until your funds are exhausted or you die. The annual distribution amounts are based on a standard life expectancy table. You can always withdraw more than you’re required to in any year. However, if you withdraw less, you’ll be hit with a 50% penalty on the difference between the required minimum and the amount you actually withdrew.

Roth IRAs

Not everyone can set up a Roth IRA. Even if you can, you may not qualify to take full advantage of it. The first requirement is that you must have taxable compensation. If your taxable compensation is at least $5,000 in 2010 (and 2009), you may be able to contribute the full amount. But it gets more complicated. Your ability to contribute to a Roth IRA in any year depends on your MAGI and your income tax filing status. Your allowable contribution may be less than the maximum possible, or nothing at all.

Tax Year 2010 
Filing status Contribution is limited if MAGI between: No contribution if MAGI over:
Single/Head of household $105,000 – $120,000 $120,000
Married joint $167,000 – $177,000 $177,000
Married separate $0 – $10,000 $10,000

Your contributions to a Roth IRA are not tax deductible. You can invest only after-tax dollars in a Roth IRA. The good news is that, if you meet certain conditions, your withdrawals from a Roth IRA will be completely free from federal income tax, including both contributions and investment earnings. To be eligible for these qualifying distributions, you must meet a five-year holding period requirement. In addition, one of the following must apply:

  • You have reached age 59½ by the time of the withdrawal
  • The withdrawal is made because of disability
  • The withdrawal is made to pay first-time homebuyer expenses ($10,000 lifetime limit from all IRAs)
  • The withdrawal is made by your beneficiary or estate after your death

Qualifying distributions will also avoid the 10% early withdrawal penalty. This ability to withdraw your funds with no taxes or penalty is a key strength of the Roth IRA. And remember, even nonqualifying distributions will be taxed (and possibly penalized) only on the investment earnings portion of the distribution, and then only to the extent that your distribution exceeds the total amount of all contributions that you have made.

Another advantage of the Roth IRA is that there are no required distributions after age 70½ or at any time during your life. You can put off taking distributions until you really need the income. Or, you can leave the entire balance to your beneficiary without ever taking a single distribution. Also, as long as you have taxable compensation and qualify, you can keep contributing to a Roth IRA after age 70½.

Choose the right IRA for you

Assuming you qualify to use both, which type of IRA is best for you? Sometimes the choice is easy. The Roth IRA will probably be a more effective tool if you don’t qualify for tax-deductible contributions to a traditional IRA. However, if you can deduct your traditional IRA contributions, the choice is more difficult. Most professionals believe that a Roth IRA will still give you more bang for your dollars in the long run, but it depends on your personal goals and circumstances. The Roth IRA may very well make more sense if you want to minimize taxes during retirement and preserve assets for your beneficiaries. But a traditional deductible IRA may be a better tool if you want to lower your yearly tax bill while you’re still working (and probably in a higher tax bracket than you’ll be in after you retire). A financial professional or tax advisor can help you pick the right type of IRA for you.

Note: You can have both a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA, but your total annual contribution to all of the IRAs that you own cannot be more than $5,000 ($6,000 if you’re age 50 or older).


Disclosure: Any information provided has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable, but is not assured and is for informational purposes only. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related right or obligation. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by any person other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If this e-mail was misdirected or if you have received it in error, please disregard. Information received or sent from this system is subject to review by supervisory personnel, is retained, and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with a legal right to the information.
 

Prepared by Forefield Inc. Copyright 2010 Forefield Inc.

Author: Chris

Comments: 0