Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released state-by-state Unemployment data for May 2010. According to the BLS the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the state of Idaho was 9.0% for the month of May, an increase of 1.3% from May 2009. Over that period, employment fell by 4,800 workers, from 609,900 to 605,000.

The change in Idaho’s unemployment rate appeared greater than the nation as a whole; the seasonally adjusted national unemployment rate rose 0.2%, to 9.7%, over the same period. However, Idaho’s rate remained below the national rate.

Eliminating the seasonal adjustment, Idaho’s labor force rose from 746,500 to 757,800 and the number of unemployed civilians jumped from 53,000 to 63,500 on a year-over-year basis.

An analysis by industry using non-seasonally adjusted figures highlights the sharp contraction in the construction, mining & logging, and other industries within the state. Notably, the education & health services industry continued to show strengthening year-over-year job growth.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Several friends and I recently shared a conversation regarding Boise’s continued viability as a economically vibrant and growing city. One friend, the former owner of a software development company, noted that many of his former employees have had to relocate away from Boise due to the lack of appropriate jobs.  Later in the conversation, Boise’s growth as a nexus for retirees was mentioned.

While the reason for the relocation is not given, Forbes.com recently posted an interactive map showing relocations into and out of US counties during 2008.

The interactive map can be found here.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics today released April 2010 Unemployment data for the 372 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) it surveys. According to the BLS the non-seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the Boise-Nampa MSA was 9.4% for the month of April, an increase of +1.4% from April 2009. Over that period, the number of unemployed workers in the Boise area rose by +4200, from 23,200 to 27,400, while the labor force rose from 290,700 to 292,700.  The unemployment rate declined -0.5% from March 2010.

 

At 9.4% Boise’s seasonally unadjusted unemployment rate was lower than the national average (9.5%), but remained stubbornly higher than the state average (9.1%) and most other areas surveyed within the state.  Boise’s +1.4% year-over-year change in the unemployment rate was also more dramatic than the national average (+0.9%) but lower than the average of the Idaho cities surveyed (+1.7%).

 

 

GRAPH: Bureau of Labor Statistics

In April 291 of the 372 MSAs had unemployment rates higher than a year earlier, and 212 MSAs had lower unemployment rates than Boise. The MSAs with the lowest unemployment rates nationally were Bismarck ND (3.6%) and Fargo ND (3.9%. Those with the highest rates were El Centro CA (27.9%) and Yuma, AZ (24.4%).

The largest decrease in the year-over-year rate were seen in Elkhart-Goshen IN (-4.8%), while the largest increases were in Las Vegas NV (+3.7%) and Farmington NM (+3.6%).

 

GRAPH: Bureau of Labor Statistics

 

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Only a few days old and already in need of updating:

  • Oil’s trading about $73, having fallen about $10/bbl since early May
  • The volume of the oil leak estimate has been revised up 500%, to 25K bbl/day from 5K, so the spill’s costing ~$1.8MM/day
  • BP’s stock has collapsed about 38% since April 20th, cutting the company’s market capitalization from about $180B to $117B
  • I haven’t heard any new estimates regarding the expected costs to plug the leak and clean up the mess, but given the number of attempts that’ve been made to date it’s a reasonable guess that the figure’s considerably higher than indicated on this graph.

Courtesy of VisualEconomics.com

UPDATE 06/02/10 1:30PM: Blog TheDisciplinedInvestor.com posted this table today, showing $200B market cap having been lost by a goup of oil and related firms since the spill.

UPDATE 06/14/10 3:00PM: The Economist posted this visual analysis of the size of the Deepwater Horizon spill, which (of course) continues to grow.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

For those keeping score, the Euro is down about -15% versus the US$ year-to-date through June 1st. 

Courtesy of VisualEconomics.com

Jun 01th

“Soft Patch”

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Who’d have thought that, until recently, anyone other than economists at the European Union, International Monetary Fund, European Central Bank would care a whit about the fiscal status of Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and other small European countries?  US investors have learned more about those nations than they perhaps ever cared to, especially the ability of small nations to unwittingly create dramatic turmoil in the financial markets.  Since we at Harmonic have been focused, like most others, on the explosion onto the world stage of sovereign risk among Euro-zone countries, the never-ending flow of US economic data has been pushed to the back burner. It appears upon examining recently released data, however, that the US economy may have slipped into what research firm International Strategy & Investment (ISI) refers to as a “soft patch.”

The strength of the economic rebound from the painful 2008-2009 recession was surprising to many observers (yours truly included) ; whether that rebound is sustainable remains a legitimate subject for debate. The manufacturing-led and stimulus-fueled rebound appears to have stalled recently:

  • the weekly unemployment figures are remaining stubbornly high
  • consumer spending data released May 28 showed a slowdown
  • ISM’s manufacturing PMI released June 1 remained in growth territory but softened
  • the Economic Cycle Research Institute’s Weekly Leading Indicator,  a composite of several indicators, has slowed markedly of late (chart below)

The downturn of the growth rate and level of the WLI are of particular concern to me; I’ve noted in earlier posts that the WLI has historically been a solid predictor of US economic activity.

Those concerns noted, the balance of economic data released in the past couple of weeks has been positive. Of particular interest were:

  • strength in housing sales (although these were undoubtedly boosted by homebuyers hurrying to capture government tax credits by signing contracts before their April 30 expiration)
  • consumer sentiment was reported rising and higher than expected
  • a very broad coincident indicator, the Chicago Fed National Activity Indicator, has continued to rise and is now in “normal” territory.

The so-called “soft patch” is a reminder that the US and world economies are far from out of the woods; while such pauses in economic recovery are probably to be expected, the exceptionally high unemployment rate, skyrocketing fiscal deficits, number and magnitude of economic problems confronting the US and other world economies continues to suggest a longer and rockier road to stability than in other post-war recoveries.