Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

It may not feel like it to many of us but according to the self-appointed arbiters of such things, the National Bureau of Economic Research, the recession that began in December 2007 officially ended in June 2009. Probably no surprise to anyone that the downturn in question was the longest since the 1930s.

Links to news and blogs on the subject:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-20/u-s-recession-ended-in-june-2009-was-longest-since-wwii-nber-panel-says.html

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/09/its-official-recession-ended-june-2009/

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Speaking of “feeling better”, the market’s recent upturn seems driven mostly by improving sentiment. True, as we noted in the economic Insight, recent economic data has been less negative if not outright positive, but we continue to question the sustainability of the most recent stock market rally.

 

The early September shift in sentiment from decidedly downbeat to a tentatively positive tone has put the bulls in charge for the moment. As the above chart shows, US large-cap (Russell 1000, white), small-cap (Russell 2000, green) and foreign stocks (EAFE, red) have rallied handily in recent days.  The recent performance of stocks in the financial sector has also offered encouragement; we expect that financials will need to participate for any stock market rally to stick. The correlation between financial stocks and the market as a whole has been extremely high since the market bottomed March 6, 2009 (about 79% R-squared); while it’s far from clear sailing we’re considering the possibility that the post-crash low-water mark was Goldman’s appearance before Congress. The recently proposed Basel III regulations aren’t nearly as onerous as they might’ve been (we’ll address in a separate analysis whether we believe that to be a good thing or not) so some of the regulatory uncertainty has been removed. Of course implementation of the US Financial Regulatory Reform legislation remains and obviously few if any financial companies were unscathed by the market and economic implosion or will remain unimpacted by the economic and regulatory environment going forward, but the worst might be behind the sector from a stock performance perspective.

A fly in the proverbial ointment, however, is that trading volume trends have not confirmed the rally.  Trading volume is considered a measure by which to judge the vigor of a market move, and unfortunately for the bullish set volume has steadily declined since earlier this year. The relatively low volume seen on the equity markets also begs a question about which market participants are driving the market action. To update a research piece we wrote earlier this year (“Who’s Buying Stocks, 1/14/10), we don’t exactly know who’s driving but we know who it’s not – individual investors buying stocks through mutual funds.  Stock mutual funds have seen outflows or negligible inflows for some time; by contrast, mutual funds investing in bonds have seen consistent and large inflows since early 2009.

One of the sources of those bond fund purchases has been, we suspect, investors seeking a relatively safe way to improve the paltry yield they’re receiving on their deposit account or money market fund. If true this trend might be considered an unintended consequence of the Fed’s ultra-low interest rate policy, inasmuch that the Fed undoubtedly hoped (expected?) that investors would use that cash to pursue capital appreciation through stocks not higher income through bonds.

Bond markets have been a very interesting venue in their own right of late, with much ink and pixels spilled over the continued decline in long-term interest rates. We plan to consider that subject in a later research piece but suffice it to say that unless the US following Japan’s lead into a multi-year deflation, a sub-3% yield on the 10-year US Treasury Note is unjustifiably low.  Interestingly, while risk aversion may be leading US and global investors to buy US Treasuries, the yield spread between Treasuries and the highest risk bonds – aka “junk” – have contracted sharply since early August, even in the face of substantial issuance.  It remains to be seen whether risk aversion or risk seeking will win the day in bond-land.

TOP: US Treasury yields (orange & green) and “B”-rated corporate bond yields (yellow & red), 8/17 & 9/17, basis points

BOTTOM: Change in US Treasury yields (blue) and “B”-rated corporate bonds yields (orange), 8/17 to 9/17, basis points

There’s been a clear trend towards equity investors seeking out income too, an understandable urge in an environment of low bond and money market yields and questionable stock appreciation potential.  As we mentioned in August’s Harmonic Notes, we expect that dividends will contribute a substantial portion of stock returns for some time to come. In response we’ve executed a shift towards dividend-weighted and dividend-paying ETFs in many of our private clients’ portfolios.

While it obviously doesn’t generate income, gold has also been the recipient of much attention.  Given its historical role as a hedge against uncertainty it’s perhaps the ultimate asset for risk adverse investors.  The price of gold recently reached all-time nominal highs after easing during July.  Energy commodity prices, more leveraged to anticipated economic activity than are precious metals, have been more volatile.

In summary, here’s where we think the stock markets are:

  • In a rally that began September 1, 2010…
  • Inside a correction that began April 26, 2010…
  • Inside a cyclical bull market that began March 2009…
  • Inside a secular bear market that began in March 2000.

HAT TIP: Ritholtz.com

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The data released since the August edition of the Harmonic Notes e-newsletter suggests that, like a patient recovering from an illness who suffers an alarming relapse, the global economy seems to have regained its path towards gradual recovery — at least for the moment.  Unlike last month, when the data was across-the-board sour, some data series have recently stabilized or risen.

  • CONSUMER

-        Home sales were abysmal after the expiration of the homebuyers’ tax credit, consumer credit continued to decline (although this is a necessary evil and a therefore a mixed blessing) and of course unemployment remains sickeningly high.

+        Retail sales, however, came in stronger than expected, as did other measures of consumer spending. Also, the Consumer Price Index rebounded to show marginally positive month-over-month growth (not that we’re rooting for inflation, but it’s better than outright deflation.) Finally, although private payrolls were uninspiring (the US economy needs about +120K new jobs each month to keep up with population growth, so +67K isn’t up to snuff) the figure improved from July and was better than expected, and the Average Hourly Earnings rose a solid +0.3%.

  • BUSINESS

-        Business productivity turned negative as costs rose during 2Q10, and the ISM Service Index fell again (although it remains marginally in expansionary territory).

+        Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization were reported better than expected, though CapU remains at a very low level.  Business inventories also grew. Importantly, the ISM Manufacturing Index unexpectedly rose well into expansionary territory.

  • INTERNATIONAL TRADE

+        Exports rose and imports fell as the July trade gap narrowed significantly, reversing June’s drop.

  • GENERAL

-        Second quarter GDP growth was revised further down, to 1.6%.

+        The Chicago Fed National Economic Activity Index rebounded to neutral. One of our favorite leading indicators, the ECRI Weekly Leading Indicator, has trended sideways for the last 2 months; after a precipitous decline it hasn’t deteriorated further, so we’ll consider that a positive.

FISCAL POLICY

Tax policy is an issue that has the potential to push the economy one way or the other. We’re not hard-core anti-tax advocates, but it seems obvious that an economy experiencing such a fragile recovery will have a difficult time bearing the weight of higher taxes. We’re pleased, therefore, to see some dialogue about extending the lower capital gains and dividend tax rates passed during the previous administration. Doing so isn’t a panacea to the US economic problems but a 1-2 year extension might keep a little more cash in consumers’ and businesses’ pockets that they could use toward helping the economy recover.

We’re in wait-and-see mode on the recently proposed additional stimulus measures, like road and rail infrastructure spending, extension of research tax credits and a 100% write-off of business investments.  Our constant refrain may sound like a broken record, but job creation is the key to driving the economy forward: To the extent these measures create jobs we’re in favor. However, it should be noted that the proposed infrastructure bill is only $50 billion, a drop in the bucket compared to the size of the US economy, and any legislation faces (1) an extremely contentious election season until early November, when political points are worth more than solutions, and (2) a lame duck Congress from November through early January.

NO DOUBLE-DIPPING

The more positive tone of the recently released data buttresses our assertion that a double-dip recession seems unlikely. Very importantly, the consumer has for the moment risen to the occasion by heading back to retail stores after an early summer pause, and the small (12% of GDP) but crucial manufacturing sector continues to expand. Though significant headwinds remain – surveys of truckers, retailers and homebuilders have recently weakened, and a recent CFO survey showed a sharp decline in optimism, so second half economic growth won’t be stellar – our view on the currently available data is that growth won’t be negative.

Risk remains clearly skewed to the downside, however. It may be that, like an aircraft taking off, a certain amount of velocity is required for an economy to “get lift” without stalling. That supposed level is about 2% according to ISI Group, so we need to see more growth than the revised 1.6% 2Q10 figure.  

Quarter-over-quarter GDP growth, 3Q05 – 2Q10

BLESSED ARE THE WEAK…

Recent further weakening in the US Dollar helps, since it makes US exports more attractive abroad. As the alarms predicting an imminent collapse of Eurozone have faded, the Euro has strengthened against the US$. The German economy has been an unexpected bright spot. The Yen has also strengthened against the US$, recently hitting a 15-year high.

CASH IS KING

It’s well known that corporations are holding a substantial amount of cash on their balance sheets. Interpretation of this fact is in the eye of the beholder: For those with a negative outlook, the roughly $2 trillion in liquid assets held by nonfinancial firms is seen as companies creating their own “insurance policy”, rational behavior in a highly uncertain (or deflationary) economic environment. According to ISI Group companies also about $1 trillion in unrepatriated foreign earnings of US firms.  For those with a more sanguine outlook, those balances are potential fuel for a market rally.

“FEELING” BETTER (SORT OF)

Obvious to even the unseasoned observer (although not to the economists that have been blinded to reality by theory) is that sentiment plays an enormous role in the workings of economies and markets. While consumers and businesses apparently “feel” a little better than they did when we wrote last month’s newsletter, they remain very uncertain about the long-term prognosis.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

or maybe 1 million jobs.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

I’m an infrequent WSJ reader (prefer the FT and Economist to watching the Journal’s slow, painful slide into becoming a sensationalist Fox News satellite). That said, those reporters who haven’t decamped to the FT, Economist, NYTimes or similar publication still do some work worth reading from time to time.  Case in point, yesterday’s Capital Journal column, capably written by Jerry Seib, surveyed economists’ suggestions for solutions to the structural problems with the US economy as a job creation engine.

I most agreed with the proposal of Douglas Holtz-Eakin:

“The more conservative Mr. Holtz-Eakin suggests a three-pronged attack.  First, he would stop using the tax system to achieve social goals and change it to focus, almost obsessively, on fostering economic growth. Second, he would liberate corporations to devote more capital to jobs by curbing the use of them as “vessels for social benefits” such as health insurance, which would be provided in other ways. And third, he would radically improve the American education system, which is “failing to a remarkable degree in delivering to the labor force people with the skills needed to compete.’”

The full article’s here.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics recently released July 2010 Unemployment data for the 372 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) it surveys. According to the BLS the non-seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the Boise-Nampa MSA was 9.2% for the month of July, an increase of +0.3% from July 2009. Over that period, the number of unemployed workers in the Boise area rose by +1200, from 26,000 to 27,200, while the labor force rose from 293,600 to 297,100.  The unemployment rate rose +0.2% from June 2010.

 

At 9.2% Boise’s seasonally unadjusted unemployment rate was lower than the national average (9.7%), but remained stubbornly higher than the state average (8.6%) and most other areas surveyed within the state.  Boise’s +0.3% year-over-year change in the unemployment rate was also more dramatic than the national average (0.0%) but smaller than the average of the Idaho cities surveyed (+0.8%).

 

 

GRAPH: Bureau of Labor Statistics

In July, 192 of the 372 MSAs had unemployment rates higher than a year earlier and 193 MSAs had lower unemployment rates than Boise. The MSAs with the lowest unemployment rates nationally were Bismarck ND (3.1%) and Fargo ND (3.7%). Those with the highest rates were El Centro CA (30.3%) and Yuma AZ (28.7%).

The largest decrease in the year-over-year rate was seen in Elkhart-Goshen IN (-3.2%) while the largest increases were in Yuma AZ (+2.6%) and Yuba City AZ (+2.6%).

 

GRAPH: Bureau of Labor Statistics