Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

I recently was honored to guest lecture to the students of Dr. Keith Harvey, CFA at Boise State University. Their senior-level class on Financial Institutions provided an interesting platform for a discussion of the economy and markets: The reason for the economic predicament in which we find ourselves (in a word, debt), the economic and market impact we’ve seen so far in this crisis, and the potential direction of the US equity markets.

Here are the slides I used to illuminate the discussion: BSU presentation 101410

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The data released since the August edition of the Harmonic Notes e-newsletter suggests that, like a patient recovering from an illness who suffers an alarming relapse, the global economy seems to have regained its path towards gradual recovery — at least for the moment.  Unlike last month, when the data was across-the-board sour, some data series have recently stabilized or risen.

  • CONSUMER

-        Home sales were abysmal after the expiration of the homebuyers’ tax credit, consumer credit continued to decline (although this is a necessary evil and a therefore a mixed blessing) and of course unemployment remains sickeningly high.

+        Retail sales, however, came in stronger than expected, as did other measures of consumer spending. Also, the Consumer Price Index rebounded to show marginally positive month-over-month growth (not that we’re rooting for inflation, but it’s better than outright deflation.) Finally, although private payrolls were uninspiring (the US economy needs about +120K new jobs each month to keep up with population growth, so +67K isn’t up to snuff) the figure improved from July and was better than expected, and the Average Hourly Earnings rose a solid +0.3%.

  • BUSINESS

-        Business productivity turned negative as costs rose during 2Q10, and the ISM Service Index fell again (although it remains marginally in expansionary territory).

+        Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization were reported better than expected, though CapU remains at a very low level.  Business inventories also grew. Importantly, the ISM Manufacturing Index unexpectedly rose well into expansionary territory.

  • INTERNATIONAL TRADE

+        Exports rose and imports fell as the July trade gap narrowed significantly, reversing June’s drop.

  • GENERAL

-        Second quarter GDP growth was revised further down, to 1.6%.

+        The Chicago Fed National Economic Activity Index rebounded to neutral. One of our favorite leading indicators, the ECRI Weekly Leading Indicator, has trended sideways for the last 2 months; after a precipitous decline it hasn’t deteriorated further, so we’ll consider that a positive.

FISCAL POLICY

Tax policy is an issue that has the potential to push the economy one way or the other. We’re not hard-core anti-tax advocates, but it seems obvious that an economy experiencing such a fragile recovery will have a difficult time bearing the weight of higher taxes. We’re pleased, therefore, to see some dialogue about extending the lower capital gains and dividend tax rates passed during the previous administration. Doing so isn’t a panacea to the US economic problems but a 1-2 year extension might keep a little more cash in consumers’ and businesses’ pockets that they could use toward helping the economy recover.

We’re in wait-and-see mode on the recently proposed additional stimulus measures, like road and rail infrastructure spending, extension of research tax credits and a 100% write-off of business investments.  Our constant refrain may sound like a broken record, but job creation is the key to driving the economy forward: To the extent these measures create jobs we’re in favor. However, it should be noted that the proposed infrastructure bill is only $50 billion, a drop in the bucket compared to the size of the US economy, and any legislation faces (1) an extremely contentious election season until early November, when political points are worth more than solutions, and (2) a lame duck Congress from November through early January.

NO DOUBLE-DIPPING

The more positive tone of the recently released data buttresses our assertion that a double-dip recession seems unlikely. Very importantly, the consumer has for the moment risen to the occasion by heading back to retail stores after an early summer pause, and the small (12% of GDP) but crucial manufacturing sector continues to expand. Though significant headwinds remain – surveys of truckers, retailers and homebuilders have recently weakened, and a recent CFO survey showed a sharp decline in optimism, so second half economic growth won’t be stellar – our view on the currently available data is that growth won’t be negative.

Risk remains clearly skewed to the downside, however. It may be that, like an aircraft taking off, a certain amount of velocity is required for an economy to “get lift” without stalling. That supposed level is about 2% according to ISI Group, so we need to see more growth than the revised 1.6% 2Q10 figure.  

Quarter-over-quarter GDP growth, 3Q05 – 2Q10

BLESSED ARE THE WEAK…

Recent further weakening in the US Dollar helps, since it makes US exports more attractive abroad. As the alarms predicting an imminent collapse of Eurozone have faded, the Euro has strengthened against the US$. The German economy has been an unexpected bright spot. The Yen has also strengthened against the US$, recently hitting a 15-year high.

CASH IS KING

It’s well known that corporations are holding a substantial amount of cash on their balance sheets. Interpretation of this fact is in the eye of the beholder: For those with a negative outlook, the roughly $2 trillion in liquid assets held by nonfinancial firms is seen as companies creating their own “insurance policy”, rational behavior in a highly uncertain (or deflationary) economic environment. According to ISI Group companies also about $1 trillion in unrepatriated foreign earnings of US firms.  For those with a more sanguine outlook, those balances are potential fuel for a market rally.

“FEELING” BETTER (SORT OF)

Obvious to even the unseasoned observer (although not to the economists that have been blinded to reality by theory) is that sentiment plays an enormous role in the workings of economies and markets. While consumers and businesses apparently “feel” a little better than they did when we wrote last month’s newsletter, they remain very uncertain about the long-term prognosis.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Regardless of one’s political views an understanding of impactful legislation is critical (not the easiest thing to attain when the legislation in question is 2300+ pages long!). We view the Financial Regulatory Reform legislation as having a potentially profound impact on the economy and markets for many years to come and so continue to seek out tools to improve our understanding.   The key question of implementation, which will literally take years, remains.

One of the better brief descriptions of the legislation, from McBee Strategic Insight via Bernstein Research, is here.  A Reuters story describing the bill shortly before its passage, is here. A resource for background is here.

Excerpts from the McBee piece:

  • Bill negotiators were sent back to the negotiating table at the eleventh hour to re-open the conference agreement. In the end, conferees agreed to delete the $19 billion bank tax which would have assessed large banks with over $50 billion in assets and financial firms that manage hedge funds with over $10 billion in assets. To cover the cost of the bill, negotiators agreed instead to increase deposit insurance assessments on banks with over $10 billion in assets and to end the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) three months early. This change was enough to attract the 60 votes needed for Senate passage of the legislation.
  • Senate Agriculture Chair Blanche Lincoln’s 716 provision, which required banks to spin off their derivatives trading activities, was modified but remained in the final legislation.
  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was established in the Federal Reserve, but remains largely independent.
  • The Financial Stability Oversight Council was established to monitor, identify and make recommendations for mitigating any threats to US financial stability.
  • The SEC will promulgate rules to set out the standards of care for
    broker-dealers and investment advisers that provide personalized advice to retail customers.
  • The final bill also contained an agreement on capital standards proposed by
    Senator Collins (R-ME), which will impose heightened standards on banks and Bank Holding Companies.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Regular readers will remember that Harmonic has often noted that one of the salient shortcomings of the US economic recovery is that small businesses have to a great degree not participated. Given that a significant portion of jobs and wealth are created and commerce is done by these firms this is an issue deserving of attention by policymakers and investors alike.

The Fed today released its 2Q10 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey (see here for a detailed review of an earlier release). According to the Fed:

“…this is the first survey that has shown an easing of standards on C&I loans to small firms since late 2006″. Also, “the July survey indicated that, on net, banks had eased standards and terms over the previous three months on loans in some categories, particularly those categories affected by competitive pressures from other banks or from nonbank lenders. While the survey results suggest that lending conditions are beginning to ease, the improvement to date has been concentrated at large domestic banks. Most banks reported that demand for business and consumer loans was about unchanged.”

The remainder of the report can be found here.  Clearly one quarter does not make a trend, but we believe this development an important step in righting the economy.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

From the NYT:

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Instructive in the debate surrounding the levels and trajectory of the Federal Debt and deficit…

SOURCE: dshort.com

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

The week ending 7 May 2010 saw indicators that were, on balance, positive for the US economy.  Consumer spending grew handily (albeit at the expense of the savings rate) and consumer-level inflation remained tame. Manufacturing continued to be the US’s dominant economic driver, even signaling improving employment within the sector. The bottom line for the ISM Manufacturing Index was that production hasn’t kept pace with demand and manufacturers are ramping up employment. The much larger service sector, however, grew at a much slower pace.  With a few caveats, the monthly unemployment figures also appeared stronger than expected, with the Household Survey confirming the headline Establishment Survey’s report of job gains; especially important to see were gains in the work week, hourly earnings and temporary jobs.  Tempering the positive news was that the percentage of “long-term unemployed” hit almost 46% and that the most comprehensive measure of under- and unemployment rose to 17.1%. Consumer credit rose marginally, following the pattern of past months in which credit card-type credit declined but non-revolving, such as auto loans, rose.

A couple of other data points rose to the surface this week that bear mentioning. 

  • Weak loan demand and poor credit availability have hamstrung large segments of the US economy, particularly impeding the ability of small businesses and households to rebound from the recession. The recently released Federal Reserve’s survey of senior loan officers showed little change in credit conditions during 1Q10:
    • Most banks kept their lending standards unchanged but a small and shrinking net fraction tightened standards.
    • Like 4Q09, banks reporting having eased standards in 1Q10 were large banks, and they apparently lent predominantly to large- and middle-market firms; small banks on balance tightened standards and lending to small businesses remained very weak.
    • Similarly, large banks reported better availability of mortgage and non-revolving credit to households but tighter standards for credit cards; small banks tightened standards across the board.
    • Loan demand in 1Q10 was reported to have generally weakened.
  • The EU/IMF bailout of Greece generated urgent headlines, with national leaders, economists and citizens in a seeming shoving match while “Athens burns.” While it’s been clear for months that Greece was in serious financial trouble, Standard & Poor’s downgrade of Greek debt on Tuesday 27 April seemed to catch the financial markets off guard and put a match to the fuse the resulted in a stomach-churning week in the markets.  We believe investors should pay close attention to the bailout – or not – of Greece because of:
    • its likely depressive effect on the European countries providing the bailout funds, many of which are major US trading partners
    • the potential contagion effect of similarly weak countries requiring or demanding a bailout
    • the fact that US taxpayer funds are contributed to the IMF.

Whether the abuser is an individual, family, a company, a municipality or nation, fiscal irresponsibility — especially the overuse of debt – usually ends poorly. Greece is the most recent and largest example, but we fear it will not be the last.

RELEASE (leading, coincident or lagging indicator) PERIOD ACTUAL EXPECTED (consensus) LAST HIA COMMENT
Consumer Spending (leading) March (MoM) +0.6% +0.6% +0.3% Personal spending in March rose at twice the pace of personal income while inflation, as measured by the PCE deflator, remained a non-issue.
ISM Manufacturing Index (leading) April 60.4 61.0 59.6 In April the manufacturing sector expanded for the eighth consecutive month to its highest level since July 2004, although the Index failed to meet consensus expectations.
ISM Services Index (leading)  April 55.4 56.4 55.4 The ISM services index remained in growth territory. The important new orders component gave up some of March’s jump.
Unemployment Rate (lagging) April 9.9% 9.6% 9.7% Unemployment rate rose as the number of Americans in the workforce rose more than the number of new hires. The Household Survey showed a employment +550K gain.
Nonfarm Payrolls (lagging) April +290K +200K +162K Less the Birth/Death adjustment and the new Census workers, payrolls rose about +40K. The average work week rose by +0.1 hours and average hourly earnings rose by +$0.01.
Consumer Credit (lagging) March +$2.0B -$3.0B -$11.5 B Incentive-driven car sales apparently accounted for March’s increase in outstanding consumer credit.

                                                                                                                                            

CONSUMER SPENDING

 

Personal Income (red) and Personal Consumption Expenditures (yellow), $MM; Personal Savings (white), % of Disposable Personal Income

GRAPH: Bloomberg

ISM MANUFACTURING INDEX

 

GRAPH: ISM

ISM SERVICES INDEX

 

GRAPH: ISM

EMPLOYMENT SITUATION

 

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

GRAPH: Bloomberg

 

MONTH-OVER-MONTH CHANGE IN NONFARM PAYROLLS

GRAPH: Bloomberg

CONSUMER CREDIT

 

CONSUMER CREDIT, $B (white), 3mo moving avg (red); 4/30/07 – 3/31/10

GRAPH: Bloomberg

 

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

Wading a bit into the political (cess)pool this morning: Below are recommendations from Barry Ritholtz, a professional investor and widely read author and blogger, regarding financial services reform. As he’s a better writer than yours truly, and arguably better informed, I pass along his thoughts below. For the record, I agree with them.

1. The Ratings Agencies: The prime enablers of the crisis, their pay-for-play business model is a debacle. Their status as Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO) should be stripped, and the space opened up for real competition.

2. Derivatives Must Be Regulated like all Financial Products: Put derivatives on exchanges; require counter-party disclosure and transparent open interest reporting. Capital requirements for trading is needed — and like other insurance products, there should be reserves for losses; Lastly, we should repeal the CFMA.

3. Regulate Non Banks lenders like Banks:  The unregulated non-bank lenders were at the heart of this crisis. It doesn’t matter if you aren’t a depository institution, if you loan money, you must be regulated like any other bank PERIOD.

4. Reinstate Net Cap Leverage Rules:  Overturn the SEC Bear Stearns exemption via Congress. Reinstate the former 12-to-1 leverage rules.

5. Eliminate Too Big To Fail:  Nixon Treasury Secretary George Shultz famously said “If they are too big to fail, make them smaller.”  Put caps on percentage of total US assets allowed. I suggest 1%. Break up insolvent, incompetent megabanks — like Citi and Bank of America. And I would carve up JPM as well. Separate the Depository Banks from the investing houses. (restoring Glass-Steagall will do that).

6. Do not give the Federal Reserve MORE Authority:  The Fed should focus on monetary policy. They can work closely with whoever is ultimately the bank regulator — but I do not believe having them be the prime overseer of banks can work.

7. Stop Regulatory Forum Shopping:  The alphabet soup of various bank regulators OTS, FDIC, OCC, etc. should be replaced with one regulator. The FDIC is the only office that did a good job this entire crisis, put all regulatory responsibility under Sheila Bair’s office.

8. Overhaul the SEC:  They need to have numerous improvements: Start by making them less of a law firm and more of a finance shop. Expand the hotline/whistleblower division, offer bounties for discovering and reporting fraud. Add a quantitative division to look for issues mathematically.

9. Reform Compensation:  The system of privatized gains, socialized losses must be thwarted. Exec compensation is totally disconnected from their performance. Major overhaul from shareholders is needed. Require custodians — Mutual funds, pension plans, etc. — to vote their holdings (shares) as a fiduciary.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

A corollary to my previous post about US employment trends during the past 10 economic downturns is a pair of graphs showing the changes in economic output over those same recessions and recoveries. These graphs, like those offered in the earlier post, are courtesy of the Minneapolis Fed.

Similar to employment, output fell at a slower rate than many past recessions until about a year into the downturn. At the point where many recessions have ended however, the current one not only extended its duration but worsened in severity.

Output growth since the “recovery” began is more encouraging, however, appearing roughly average of the last 10. However, it should be remembered that thusfar this growth consists almost entirely of a temporary inventory adjustment and was fueled by an unprecedented amount of monetary and fiscal stimulus.

*The start of the recovery is estimated to be 3Q09.

Author: Kenn Lamson

Comments: 0

I’m a data junkie, to be sure, but like many people I gather information best when it’s presented visually. To wit, these graphs courtesy of the Minneapolis Fed, show the change in employment during the past 10 recessions (as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Resesarch).

The first shows the change since the beginning of the recession; the second, the change since the “recovery*”.

As is immediately obvious, layoffs began at a slower rate in the current economic downturn, but by about a year into the recession, layoffs had eclipsed every other post-war recession. Further, this, like 2001 recession, has been a jobless recovery.

*Official date hasn’t been announced by the NBER. Assuming July 2009 for the purposes of this analysis.