Two significant economic releases bookended the week: The stock market rallied solidly on Monday’s much better-than-expected ISM Manufacturing survey, while Friday’s unemployment figures saw a drop in the reported unemployment rate. Of special note within the Employment Situation report was the overstatement of job creation by the BLS’s Birth / Death Model between April 2008 and December 2009 to the tune of 1.184 million jobs. Despite its relatively small weight in the US economy, manufacturing appears to be leading the economy out of recession. The consumer, however, continues to retrench.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ISM Manufacturing Index (leading)
|
January | 58.4 | 55.0 | 55.9 | Manufacturing sector expanded for the sixth consecutive month in January, and accelerated from December. | |||||||||||||||||
| Construction Spending (leading)
|
December (MoM) | -1.2% | -0.5% | -0.6% | Construction spending continued its earlier downward trend. Downside acceleration in private residential spending was the primary culprit. | |||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Spending (leading)
|
December (MoM)
|
0.2%
|
0.3% | 0.5% | On an inflation-adjusted basis, MoM spending rose 0.1%. | |||||||||||||||||
| ISM Non-manufacturing Composite (leading)
|
January | 50.5 | 51.0 | 49.8 | The ISM’s non-manufacturing index rose slightly and moved into expansionary territory in December. The important new orders component grew for the fifth consecutive month. | |||||||||||||||||
| Factory Orders (leading) | December (MoM) | 1.0% | 0.5% | 1.1% | Orders for both durable and nondurable goods rose 1.0%. | |||||||||||||||||
| Unemploy-ment Rate (lagging)
|
January | 9.7% | 10.1% | 10.0% | Unemployment rate unexpectedly declined. According to the Household Survey the number of unemployed Americans declined by -430K to 14.8 million in January; this number has risen by 8.4 million since the official beginning of the recession in December 2007. | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonfarm Payrolls (lagging)
|
January | -20K | 0 | -85K | The seasonally adjusted data show a drop of -60K jobs in goods-producing businesses, versus a gain of 48K in service-providing businesses. | |||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Credit (lagging) | December | -$1.8billion | -$10.0 billion | -$17.5 billion | Consumer credit continued to decline in December, but by much less than was anticipated. |
ISM MANUFACTURING INDEX
While it represents a relatively small percentage of the economy, this report clearly confirms an improving manufacturing sector. This was the highest reading of the Index since August 2004. Growth appeared in 13 of 16 industries surveyed. Importantly, new orders accelerated for the seventh month and the order backlog grew for the first month. The employment component of the Index rose by three points into solidly positive territory, suggesting that manufacturers have reached their maximum productive capacity given existing resources and have begun to hire. Inventories remain extremely lean.
Level of ISM Manufacturing Index, 2004-date
CONSTRUCTION SPENDING
A -2.8% month-over-month decline in residential spending was the primary driver of December’s shortfall. Nonresidential construction spending rose 0.2% in December while government spending fell 1.2%. For all of 2009, construction spending declined 12.4% from 2008.
Weakness in construction spending is a double-edged sword: Positively, a slower rate of construction makes it easier for the large volume of vacant, foreclosed or otherwise distressed homes and other buildings to be absorbed; negatively, however, continued contraction of this sector of the economy removes a potential driver of employment and incomes. Clearly it’s unlikely that construction will be a broad-based engine of economic growth in the near future.
Month-over-month change in Construction Spending, 2005-date
CONSUMER SPENDING
On balance, consumer spending continued on its gradual uptrend, albeit (once again) at a slower rate than expected. December’s increase was lead by spending on services, which gained 0.5% month-over-month. Spending on durable goods was flat while spending on nondurables fell -0.6%. The personal savings rate increased from a revised 4.5% in November to 4.8% in December. We believe it’s exceptionally unlikely that the American consumer will resume spending at pre-recessionary levels anytime soon (perhaps for many years), given the elevated unemployment level and other sources of economic distress; however, stabilization and moderate growth in spending driven by increases in wages and employment while simultaneously reducing outstanding credit and raising the savings rate is our fervent hope.
Month-over-month change in Consumer Spending, 2005-date
ISM NON-MANUFACTURING INDEX
Although it failed to meet the consensus of analysts’ expectations, the Index shifted back above the 50.0 mark, indicating expansion of the critical service sector. Growth was seen in the “other services”, “information”, “utilities” and “wholesale trade” industries. Growth of the new orders component for the fifth consecutive month is also encouraging. However, the Index’s employment component showed a slower rate of contraction but remains at a dismal level.
Level of the ISM Non-manufacturing Index, 2005-date
FACTORY ORDERS
Growth in new orders was solid for both nondurable goods and durable ones in December. New order growth was strongest in construction machinery, power transmission equipment and metalworking machinery. Orders were weakest in nondefense aircraft & parts and defense communication equipment. Basically an updated version of last week’s Durable Goods Orders release, the durable goods side of this series tends to be fairly volatile since it includes high value transportation items such as aircraft and ships.
Month-over-month change in Factory Orders, 2005-date
EMPLOYMENT SITUATION
The most closely-watched economic release of the week (and the month) was Friday’s Employment Situation. It’s somewhat confusing because it contains data from two surveys, the Household and the Establishment, that are conducted differently and therefore provide different estimates. Also, each Survey shows both Seasonally Adjusted and Not Seasonally Adjusted data, so getting a read on what’s actually happening is challenging. The “headline” numbers are the Unemployment Rate from the Household Survey and the Nonfarm Payrolls figure from the Establishment Survey, both of which are seasonally adjusted. For a broader discussion of the Employment Situation data, see our Economic Insight research entitled “Fun With Numbers” released 5 September 09.
Household Survey
Adjusted for seasonal variations, the Household Survey data showed that the number of unemployed persons fell by -430K during January, continuing the decline from prior months. Full-time workers have declined by -4.0 million over the past year while part-time workers have increased by 100K. About 8.3 million Americans are employed part-time because of slack business conditions or because they could only find part-time work, down from 9.2 million in December. Multiple job-holders rose slightly to 5.2% of the total employed. The average duration of unemployment extended another week to 30.2 weeks – about 7 months – with an alarming 41.2% of unemployed Americans remaining unemployed 27 weeks or longer. Because of the decline in the number of temporary and part-time workers, the broadest measure of unemployment, which includes “marginally attached” and “discouraged” workers, declined to 16.5% from 17.3% in December.
According to the Household Survey the unemployment rate for manufacturing jobs was 13.0%; for construction, 24.7%; agriculture, 21.3%; healthcare and education, 5.5%; and government, 4.3%.
TOP GRAPH: “Headline” (U-3) unemployment rate – white; broadest reported measure (U-6) – orange
BOTTOM GRAPH: U-6 rate less U-3 rate
Establishment Survey
The seasonally adjusted Establishment Survey data showed a drop of -60K jobs in goods-producing businesses versus a gain of 48K jobs in service-providing businesses; notably, this report appears at odds with the ISM manufacturing and nonmanufacturing survey data cited above.
The Survey showed gains in many major private industry groups. Retail trade was reported to have added 42K jobs during January while temporary help services added 52K and motor vehicle & parts companies added 22.7K. Meanwhile, the construction sector lost -75K and transportation & warehousing lost -19K. Government employment totals fell by -8K.
Average hourly earnings were $22.45 in January, up $0.04 from December and $0.44 from a year ago. While increases from November varied by industry, year-over-year gains were broad-based, with declines in only a handful of industries.
The average work-week lengthened by 0.1 hours to 33.9 hours. The longest work-weeks were recorded in Mining & Logging (42.7 hours), Utilities (40.6 hours) and Durable Goods manufacturing (40.0 hours). The shortest hours were, unsurprisingly, in Leisure & Hospitality (25.6 hours), Retail (31.1 hours) and Education & Healthcare (32.7 hours).
Monthly change in nonfarm payrolls, 2005-date
Analysis
The Establishment Survey has a “large company” bias; the “birth/death model” is used to estimate the number of jobs created by small companies. Given the importance of small businesses in our economy, we believe (and the historical record would suggest) that these firms are the “canary in the coalmine” of domestic economic activity, since they have less cash on the balance sheet, less access to credit, and less exposure to overseas markets than large companies. Consequently, we prefer to emphasize the Household Survey in our analyses.
There were enormous seasonal adjustments to Friday’s report. For instance, while the seasonally adjusted change in Establishment Survey payrolls was only -20K, the non-seasonally adjusted figure plummeted -2.819 million.
Also, revisions to the historical data were included with Friday’s report that make historical comparison difficult. Of special note was the overstatement of job creation by the BLS’s Birth / Death Model between April 2008 and December 2009 to the tune of 1.184 million jobs. Quoting our Economic Insight “Fun With Numbers”, Harmonic feels compelled to question the usefulness of a model that creates from thin air a substantial number of jobs in a given month, in an environment in which companies that are too small or new to be officially surveyed may have difficulty finding financing.
Notwithstanding the huge seasonal adjustments and revisions that make drawing a conclusion difficult, Friday’s release is marginally positive:
- The Household Survey’s reported seasonally-adjusted month-over-month decline of -430K in the number of unemployed Americans and an increase by 541K in the number employed.
- The broadest measure of under- and unemployment declined sharply, predominantly due to a 10% decline in the number of Americans working part-time for economic reasons.
- The length of the average work-week continued to creep higher, although it remains near its record low.
- Average hourly earnings rose.
Additionally, the number of Americans considered “not in the labor force” fell by about 200K; the labor force participation rate rose from 64.6% to 64.7%. However, the extremely long average period of unemployment is also of great concern. It should further give one pause to note that the same number of Americans are now employed – 129.5 million – as in 1999, while the working-age population has increased by 29 million.
graph courtesy of CalculatedRiskBlog.com
CONSUMER CREDIT
Consumer credit outstanding dropped again in December, but nowhere near to the degree that was expected. Non-revolving credit, such as auto loans, actually rose 5.2% (a reversal of last month’s -6.1% decrease); in fact, auto sales were the strongest in December since August of last year. Revolving credit like credit cards continued its precipitous decline, dropping -11.7% on top of last month’s -18.6% plummet. The decline reflects both consumer pay-downs and tightened credit standards.










Mar 05th
Weekly Economic Insight: 1 March – 5 March 2010
Author: Kenn Lamson
Comments: 0
The week ending 5 March 2010 saw the manufacturing sector post somewhat slower growth than expected but services moving further into expansionary territory. The American consumer may have recently loosened the purse-strings, with both spending and credit rising more than expected.
CONSUMER SPENDING
On balance, consumer spending continued on its gradual uptrend, and for a change was at a faster rate than expected. January’s increase was lead by spending on nondurable goods (boosted by gasoline expenditures), which gained 1.8% month-over-month. Spending on durable goods was up only 0.1% and services up 0.2%. The monthly personal savings rate fell from a revised 4.2% in December to 3.3% in January. We believe it’s exceptionally unlikely that the American consumer will resume spending at pre-recessionary levels anytime soon (perhaps for many years), given the elevated unemployment level and other sources of economic distress; however, stabilization and moderate growth in spending driven by increases in wages and employment while simultaneously reducing outstanding credit and raising the savings rate is our fervent hope.
ISM MANUFACTURING INDEX
While it represents a relatively small percentage of the economy, this report points to a continued expansion of the manufacturing sector. While the survey fell back from January’s surprisingly good reading, the Index level indicates solid growth. Growth appeared in 11 of 16 industries surveyed. Importantly, new orders accelerated for the eighth month and the order backlog grew for the second month. The employment component of the Index rose by nearly three points further into positive territory, suggesting that manufacturers have reached their maximum productive capacity given existing resources and have begun to hire. Inventories remain extremely lean.
CONSTRUCTION SPENDING
A -1.4% month-over-month decline in non-residential spending was the primary driver of the January decline. Residential construction spending rose +1.1% in January while government spending fell -0.7%. Year-over-year, total construction spending declined -9.3%.
Weakness in construction spending is a double-edged sword: Positively, a slower rate of construction makes it easier for the large volume of vacant, foreclosed or otherwise distressed homes and other buildings to be absorbed; negatively, however, continued contraction of this sector of the economy removes a potential driver of employment and incomes. Clearly it’s unlikely that construction will be a broad-based engine of economic growth in the near future.
White = actual; Red = revised
ISM SERVICES INDEX
Beating the consensus of analysts’ expectations, the Index rose further above the 50.0 mark, indicating continued expansion of the critical service sector. Growth was seen in the “information”, “arts, entertainment & recreation” and “transportation” industries. Growth of the new orders component for the sixth consecutive month is also encouraging. However, the Index’s employment component showed a slower rate of contraction but remains at a dismal level. Also concerning is that only 9 of 18 industries expanded, with 8 continuing to contract.
FACTORY ORDERS
Growth in new orders was solid for both nondurable goods and durable ones in January. Orders were strongest in nondefense aircraft & parts and defense communication equipment (last month’s weakest groups). New order growth was weakest in power transmission equipment and photographic equipment. Basically an updated version of last week’s Durable Goods Orders release, the durable goods side of this series tends to be fairly volatile since it includes high value transportation items such as aircraft and ships.
PRODUCTIVITY AND COSTS
Unsurprisingly, since unemployment has risen while manufacturing has apparently begun to rebound, labor productivity – the amount of goods and services produced per worker – rose sharply in the fourth quarter of 2009. As companies sliced payrolls and benefits, Unit Labor Costs – the ratio of hourly compensation to productivity – of course declined.
While this data is by now old news, it reinforces that, since labor-related costs are the vast majority of expenses for most companies, consumer-level inflation is unlikely to become a problem in the near-term.
Quarter-over-Quarter change in Labor Productivity (white) and Unit Labor Costs (red)
EMPLOYMENT SITUATION
The most closely-watched economic release of the week (and the month) was Friday’s Employment Situation. It’s somewhat confusing because it contains data from two surveys, the Household and the Establishment, that are conducted differently and therefore provide different estimates. Also, each Survey shows both Seasonally Adjusted and Not Seasonally Adjusted data, so getting a read on what’s actually happening is challenging. The “headline” numbers are the Unemployment Rate from the Household Survey and the Nonfarm Payrolls figure from the Establishment Survey, both of which are seasonally adjusted. For a broader discussion of the Employment Situation data, see our Economic Insight research entitled “Fun With Numbers” released 5 September 09.
Household Survey
Adjusted for seasonal variations, the Household Survey data showed that the number of unemployed persons rose by +34K during February, interrupting the decline from prior months. Full-time workers have declined by -4.0 million over the past year while part-time workers have increased by about +1 million. About 8.8 million Americans are employed part-time because of slack business conditions or because they could only find part-time work, up from 8.3 million in January. Multiple job-holders remained relatively stable at 5.1% of the total employed. The average duration of unemployment shortened slightly in February to 29.7 weeks from 30.2 weeks – about 7 months – but an alarming 40.9% (6.1 million) of unemployed Americans remaining unemployed 27 weeks or longer. Because of the increase in the number of temporary and part-time workers, the broadest measure of labor underutilization, which also includes “marginally attached” and “discouraged” workers, rose to 16.8% in February from 16.5% in January.
According to the Household Survey the unemployment rate for manufacturing jobs was 12.1%; for construction, 27.1%; agriculture, 18.8%; healthcare and education, 5.6%; and government, 4.0%.
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
Establishment Survey
The seasonally adjusted Establishment Survey data showed a drop of -60K jobs in goods-producing businesses versus a gain of +42K jobs in service-providing businesses; notably, this report appears at odds with the ISM manufacturing and nonmanufacturing survey data cited above.
While the overall number showed a small (-18K) decline, the Survey showed gains in many major private industry groups. As suggested by the Household Survey, temporary help services once again added a relatively large number of workers (+48K) and healthcare & social assistance companies added +20K. Meanwhile, the construction sector continued to bleed jobs, losing another -64K and transportation & warehousing lost another -12K. Government employment totals fell by -18K, with local government shedding -31K while the Federal government added +16K.
Average hourly earnings were $22.46 in January, up $0.01 from January and $0.41 from a year ago. Month-over-month Increases have been modest but consistent, reinforcing the idea that wage pressures are nonexistent.
The average private work-week shortened by -0.1 hours to 33.8 hours. The longest work-weeks were recorded in Mining & Logging (42.6 hours), Utilities (40.6 hours) and Durable Goods manufacturing (39.8 hours). The shortest hours were, unsurprisingly, in Leisure & Hospitality (25.7 hours), Retail (31.2 hours) and Education & Healthcare (32.6 hours).
MONTH-OVER-MONTH CHANGE IN NONFARM PAYROLLS
Analysis
The Establishment Survey has a “large company” bias; the “birth/death model” is used to estimate the number of jobs created by small companies. Given the importance of small businesses in our economy, we believe (and the historical record would suggest) that these firms are the “canary in the coalmine” of domestic economic activity, since they have less cash on the balance sheet, less access to credit, and less exposure to overseas markets than large companies. Consequently, we prefer to emphasize the Household Survey in our analyses.
According to the BLS the massive snowstorms that hit the US (especially the east coast) probably didn’t skew the February unemployment stats. However, according to the BLS, “In order for severe weather conditions to reduce the estimate for payroll unemployment, employees have to be off work for an entire pay period and not be paid for the time missed. While some persons may have been off payrolls during eh survey reference period, some industries, such as those dealing with cleanup and repair activities, may have added workers.”
We see Friday’s release as offering mixed signals:
A rather sobering realization is the fact that if this recovery were “normal”, the economy should be generating substantially more jobs than were are currently seeing. According to economist and strategist David Rosenberg, 2.5 years after the Fed begins to ease, the economy is usually generating about 150K jobs per month; job gains after a quarter of 5.9% GDP growth (like we saw in 4Q09) are usually about 215K per month. The gulf between “what should be” and “what is” highlights the difficulty the economy’s government handlers will have getting it up off the mat.
CONSUMER CREDIT
Consumer credit outstanding rose in January for the first time in a year. Non-revolving credit, such as auto loans, actually rose 5.0% (a continuation of January’s 3.7% increase). Revolving credit like credit cards fell at a much slower rate, dropping -2.3% on top of last month’s -12.9% plummet. The decline reflects both consumer pay-downs and tightened credit standards.